CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > STAR-CCM+

Laminar or Turbulent Flow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 8, 2015, 05:00
Default Laminar or Turbulent Flow
New Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 3
Field85 is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

I have a query regarding a project I finished recently. It was a replicate a Wind Turbine setup in a wind tunnel and simulate the experimental conditions and wake of the turbine, then drawings correlations, if any, with the experimental results.

The simulations correlated strongly with the exp. results however I have a query.

I was questions about the validity of selecting turbulent flow instead of laminar flow as the reynolds number over the individual blades was only approx 18,000-20,000. Given these low values I was told I could have modeled the blades as small flat plates and yielded the same results????

Any one have an opinion on this?

Last edited by Field85; June 17, 2015 at 10:10. Reason: Added Images
Field85 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 8, 2015, 11:31
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 352
Rep Power: 4
MBdonCFD is on a distinguished road
Same results? No way. Similar results? Sure. To get the same results the flat plate drag and lift coefficeints would have to be the same as the sectional data. Even at extremely low Re, this doesn't happen really. Your visualizations would be essentially identical, but thrust, torque and power would all be a little off. I think your model is fine the way it is.

As for laminar vs turbulent. Don't debate this. Even though you may have low reynolds number and even laminar flow over the blades, the wake is most definitely not laminar. At a minimum there will be turbulent mixing of the wake with the freestream as it propagates. Doing a laminar simulation would mean that there is no turbulence equation to govern this behavior.

Nice images by the way...
MBdonCFD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 8, 2015, 11:44
New Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 3
Field85 is on a distinguished road
Cheers MBdonCFD,

It was all because of a query that came up during my defence of the project with a lecturer. I hadnt even questioned my setup before I had entered, and no papers or comments from my supervisor had indicated anything other than a solid setup. Will wait on results and see.

My argument was was exactly as you had mentioned that the wake would be turbulent, and calculating a reynolds number (which I did not include in the final report as it did not influence my decisions on setup) to see whether the flow over the small wind turbine model was laminar or turbulent would have changed that.

Images were easily done with a custom color map, making some scaler values transparent
Field85 is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Issues on the simulation of high-speed compressible flow within turbomachinery dowlee OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 August 27, 2015 05:26
Do formula for Laminar and Turbulent Flow Calculation formulae change with Fluid Parag Gadgil FLUENT 0 June 19, 2012 07:07
Turbulent / laminar flow broken Main CFD Forum 0 May 9, 2012 06:44
Can I use turbulent model to solve a laminar flow? nikhil FLUENT 5 February 1, 2011 11:42
Turbulent viscosity in Laminar Flow Mike Main CFD Forum 8 April 12, 2010 11:40

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05.