CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > STAR-CCM+

vof=0.5 in dfbi

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 8, 2009, 06:27
Default vof=0.5 in dfbi
  #1
Member
 
Radiatn
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 8
radiatn is on a distinguished road
In the tutorial, why do they choose 0.5 to visualize the isosurface of VOF? What does VOF=0.5 mean? Is it a surface where it is 50% air and 50% water? Shouldn't we use VOF=1.0 to show the actual surface of water? Can I get explanation from the DFBI experts in here?
radiatn is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 8, 2009, 14:33
Default
  #2
Member
 
Anton Lyaskin
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Samara, Russia
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 8
A_Lyaskin is on a distinguished road
Actually any fractional VOF value (i.e. 0<VOF<1) means that gas-liquid interface is within this cell. And because isosurface creation tool doesn't use any interface reconstruction technic, any isosurface, for any VOF value, will not coincide exactly with actual interface.
A_Lyaskin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 8, 2009, 20:36
Default
  #3
Member
 
Radiatn
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 8
radiatn is on a distinguished road
Thanks Anton! So, that means we should be showing the VOF=1.0 if we really want to show the actual surface of water? Why does tutorial choose 0.5? When I played with VOF values, almost nothing appears when the 0.9<VOF<=1.0. And between 0.5 and 0.8 the surface looks radically different so the question is which VOF value truly represents the surface for my customers to understand? Your info on interface construction technique is good. I think CD-Adapco should update their adapco-online website with this kind of basic general information.
radiatn is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 9, 2009, 04:07
Default
  #4
Member
 
Anton Lyaskin
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Samara, Russia
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 8
A_Lyaskin is on a distinguished road
No, the situation is more tricky. There's no way to get CORRECT representation of REAL free surface with isosurface of VOF. The best way is just to select all the cells for which 0<VOF<1 (note that the inequality is strict!). This will give you all the cells which are crossed by the interface. This will not look nice, I guess, but at least it will be physically correct. And you can then compare isosurfaces with different VOF values with this cell set and choose the best match. Probably VOF = 0.5 will be the best, but you'll have to try.

If you want something nice looking AND correct at the same time, then you'll probably need some advanced postprocessing. You'll have to use interface reconstruction techcnics, which are usually built in into VOF algorithm. I'm not a VOF expert, but I think you can find some in VOF papers. And implementing them will require pretty heavy programming.
A_Lyaskin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 16, 2009, 05:57
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Ping
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 223
Rep Power: 9
ping is on a distinguished road
Please go and read the theory on STAR-CCM+'s VOF model !

Modeling > Modeling Multi-Phase Flow > Using the VOF Multi-Phase Model > What Is the VOF Multi-Phase Model?

VOF = 0 means zero of the second phase, and VOF = 1 mean 100% of that phase., so 0.5 is half way between, and where the free surface is located.
ping is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
i need info on DFBI Eleazar CD-adapco 7 September 2, 2010 03:13
DFBI, turbulence model and ship motion ettax CD-adapco 1 June 4, 2010 12:31
DFBI question Atlas CD-adapco 3 January 21, 2009 17:21
VOF WAVE/ DFBI MAB CD-adapco 7 November 17, 2008 22:34
VOF WAVE/ DFBI MAB FLOW-3D 2 November 14, 2008 01:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01.