CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > STAR-CCM+

Divergence detected in Valve simulation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 22, 2009, 13:13
Default Divergence detected in Valve simulation
  #1
New Member
 
mehul
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 8
mehn is on a distinguished road
Dear friends,
I am doing valve simulation, wherein the flow Bcs are stagnation pressure at inlet and pressure at outlet. I want to calculate mass flow rate by this simulation. The problem is ,as soon as I start the simultaion in starccm, the flow diverges within 10 iterations. The mass flow rate value at outlet shoots very high (in terms of thousands, which is not possible). What may be the reason?. I also tried to change Inlet BC as velocity. But the results are same. I am using compressible state. (Ideal gas). My intention is to find the mass flow at inlet and outlet by specifying pressure drop. The state of the flow is steady.
mehn is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 23, 2009, 02:25
Default
  #2
Member
 
Bernard Esterhuyse
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 8
bernarde is on a distinguished road
Hi

The problem might be related to your mesh. One thing to try is to create threshold plots for different variables (pressure, temperature) to see if there are certain cells where the values are exploding. You might have a couple of bad quality cells in your mesh.

Regards
bernarde is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 23, 2009, 08:13
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Aroon
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Racine WI
Posts: 148
Rep Power: 8
vishyaroon is on a distinguished road
Have you tried using the Mass Flow Split outlet BC instead of the pressure BC at the outlet?

I'm not certain, but my guess is that by specifying the Stagnation BC at Inlet and Pressure at Outlet you are specifying the pressures at both the inlet and outlet and you may be over-specifying the system.
vishyaroon is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 23, 2009, 08:28
Default
  #4
New Member
 
mehul
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 8
mehn is on a distinguished road
Dear friends,


I got the solution.


Thank you.
mehn is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 23, 2009, 08:32
Default
  #5
Member
 
Bernard Esterhuyse
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 8
bernarde is on a distinguished road
What was the problem?
bernarde is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 23, 2009, 08:38
Default
  #6
New Member
 
mehul
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 8
mehn is on a distinguished road
Well, I was not getting the converged solution. The solver diverged within 10 iterations. I initialized with 2 bar (as suggested by support engineers). May be, its easy to relieve gradient, but it is very difficult for solver to create pressure gradient.
I took 2 bar as initial pressure and pressure inlet 2 bar and pressure outlet 1 bar.
mehn is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Divergence detected when using parallel solver Phil FLUENT 3 May 9, 2008 08:17
divergence detected in AMG solver !!! yansheng FLUENT 0 September 27, 2007 11:22
user subroutine error CFDUSER CFX 2 December 9, 2006 07:31
user defined function cfduser CFX 0 April 29, 2006 10:58
problems simulation ideal gas, divergence in AMG S Ralf Schmidt FLUENT 11 October 1, 2005 13:21


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:57.