|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
vismech
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Hello
What is the optimum size of the rotating domain (which is the interface b/w rotaing and stationary regions) around the rotating part, while simulating rotation using MRF approach. Should i use sufficiently large domain or very closely hugging domain to the rotating body or it depends upon the shape and geometry of rotating body ! Thanks in Advance ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 99
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
I always try to keep the rotating flow within the rotating reference frame as much as possible. If simulating an axial fan I think that it is best to hug the rotating body on the upstream side, but extend as far downstream as possible. It is questionable if this is really necessary, but that is how we do it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Problems in compiling paraview in Suse 10.3 platform | chiven | OpenFOAM Installation | 3 | December 1, 2009 07:21 |
| Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 17 | August 22, 2009 03:59 |
| Phase locked average in run time | panara | OpenFOAM | 2 | February 20, 2008 14:37 |
| fluent add additional zones for the mesh file | SSL | FLUENT | 2 | January 26, 2008 11:55 |
| Size of rotating domain | Adam | CFX | 4 | November 28, 2006 10:28 |