CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > STAR-CCM+

Airfoil problem

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 4, 2010, 00:05
Default Airfoil problem
  #1
New Member
 
musyrif
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 7
AirWolf is on a distinguished road
Greetings people.
I had some problem with my simulation.
FYI, I need to find the drag & lift coefficient for NACA 0063.
The velocity of the wind is 3 m/s while the chord of the airfoil is 0.15m. So, I use laminar in this simulation
During the simulation, the graph for lift coefficient is not converged even when I performed at 10000 iterations.
Therefore, I need suggestions to solve this problem.
I hope you guys would share some experience & knowledge about airfoil simulation to me..
thanks
AirWolf is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 5, 2010, 19:00
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Eric Nutsch
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Eugene, Oregon USA
Posts: 112
Rep Power: 7
ericnutsch is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to ericnutsch
In my experience it usually has to do with not a small enough resolution in grid size or time step.

Is the solution steady state? What is the resolution of your mesh? Is you mesh structured or unstructured?
ericnutsch is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 6, 2010, 01:36
Default
  #3
New Member
 
musyrif
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 7
AirWolf is on a distinguished road
I assume the solution is steady state.
what do u mean by structured or unstructured mesh?
I suspect my mesh is not good enough.
Therefore, I need to redo my work.
What do u think the suitable solution mesh for this airfoil?
The chord is 0.15m and the span is 0.3m.
AirWolf is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 6, 2010, 13:40
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Eric Nutsch
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Eugene, Oregon USA
Posts: 112
Rep Power: 7
ericnutsch is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to ericnutsch
Structured would be squares or hexahedrals, and unstructured would be triangles or tetrahedrals.

The right resolution is usually the largest number of cells that your hardware can reasonably handle

The lower your resolution, the better you have to be at everything else( mesh quality, error analysis, models, solver variables, etc) to get reasonable results. So for starting out, I recommend putting the resolution to the max( 1GB ram = 1million cells max, aprox).

If your solution is 3D I recommend switching to 2D if the assumption can be made. It allow you much more resolution.

Best of Luck!
ericnutsch is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 7, 2010, 09:14
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 637
Rep Power: 12
abdul099 is on a distinguished road
Hi

your simulation has got a very low reynolds number. Maybe there is a problem with laminar separation bubbles? I'm doing simulations on a E603 on a reynolds number of 1e6, and there are still laminar separation bubbles, so it is not really a stationary case.

But i've made the experience, the lift and drag coefficient hits the experimental data very well, even if it seems, the simulation is not converged. Residuals stay the same from approx. 200 iterations, but the forces are meeting the experimental data from approx. 1000 iterations.
I don't know the exact reason, but i'm assuming, it has to do with the normalisation of the residuals...

greetings
abdul099 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 12, 2010, 00:37
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
kazakage is on a distinguished road
Of course our simulation has lower reynolds number since the velocity only about 3 m/s.
i've some questions that play in my mind, should i running iterations go further until the drag and lift coefficients converge..or should i make some alteration regarding prism layer thickness and meshing settings...thanks
kazakage is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem running simpleFoam on a multi element airfoil vinz OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 18 April 11, 2013 11:26
Problem Meshing Airfoil erodv OpenFOAM 12 January 11, 2012 18:46
[FloWorks] Request advice for an airfoil calculation problem Bogey Jammer Main CFD Forum 0 September 29, 2009 17:06
Airfoil: Laminar or Turbulent Yap Wen Jiun Main CFD Forum 3 March 12, 2000 12:31
Is this problem well posed? Thomas P. Abraham Main CFD Forum 5 September 8, 1999 14:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:03.