CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > STAR-CCM+

mean, variance and covariance statistics of any field function on any part.

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 12, 2010, 17:55
Default mean, variance and covariance statistics of any field function on any part.
  #1
New Member
 
Subhadeep
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 7
Subhadeep is on a distinguished road
StarCCM+ documentation says this from version 2.06.004 :
"
A new ability to compute the mean, variance and covariance statistics of any field function on any part. The primary driver for this is LES and DES where you might want to compute means or stresses from the instantaneous velocity, or the mean skin friction or heat transfer on a wall.
"

How does one do this? via monitor or via new field function. If I do a new field function, say for Velocity: X-Component, what should the variance definition be?

I saw one example where it said $MixtureFractionVariance so I tried this as a new field function

$Velocity_0Variance

BUT I am getting syntax error in the assembly code.

Can anyone tell me the definition of variance for U velocity and mean of U velocity?

Thanks!
Subhadeep is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 16, 2010, 12:20
Default
  #2
f-w
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 129
Rep Power: 8
f-w is on a distinguished road
Right click on Monitors > New Monitor ...
f-w is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 16, 2010, 12:34
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Subhadeep
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 7
Subhadeep is on a distinguished road
okay I have done that in the past BUT it remains as a monitor.

What about if I want that monitor variable to be written out in a Table for every time step for a specific part in the computational domain?

Are you saying once I create that Monitor variable it then shows up as a Variable in the field functions too?
Subhadeep is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 16, 2010, 17:33
Default
  #4
f-w
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 129
Rep Power: 8
f-w is on a distinguished road
Doesn't look like it shows up as a Field Function. But, you can easily export a table by right-clicking and selecting "Export." In the definition of a monitor, you can specify whether to tabulate versus iteration or time step.
f-w is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 16, 2010, 17:48
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Subhadeep
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 7
Subhadeep is on a distinguished road
The problem I am having when I am using the Field Function Monitor is this:

Successfully able to create the field variance monitor BUT for the part choice it is only allowing me to select parts from the entire computational domain and the boundary parts BUT not a selective Derived Part I have in the tree.

If I look up documentation under "What is a Field Function Monitor?" I see the documentation as

"
Once you set their Field Function and Parts properties, these monitors can be displayed as scalar quantities just like other field functions.
"

This is where I am failing to select my desired Derived Part and Tabulate the results. What am I missing?
Subhadeep is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 17, 2010, 13:52
Default
  #6
f-w
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 129
Rep Power: 8
f-w is on a distinguished road
I can confirm that you can't select Derived Parts as input for these Field Monitors in v4.06

In terms of using it as a scalar, when I create a Mean Monitor of Pressure Coefficient on some part, in its definition, under Title, the name of the corresponding Field Function is given. In this case, it's "Mean of Pressure Coefficient."

If you only care about an average of some quantity on a derived part for the current time step, you can always create an Area Averaged report and plot that.
f-w is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 17, 2010, 15:12
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Subhadeep
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 7
Subhadeep is on a distinguished road
My goal is slightly different.

I want to establish Turbulent Statistics for Unsteady simulations in DES and LES.

If these mean, variance were working correctly then the simulation itself would be keeping track of the time averaging and I could then export out the tabulated results once turbulence statistics long term (time -> Infinity) has been established.

So for example I want to get

Re UU stress = (1/N)Sum((U(i) - UMean), {i,1,N}) and N is a very large number, say 10000

Right now I am constrained to writing Macro to get the primary variables and write them out and do the post processing outside StarCCM+ that is very time consuming.

When I read the portion in the documentation that mean, variance, covariance of any part can be calculated for any part in an unsteady simulation I wanted to know if someone had used it since I was having a hard time to get it to work.
Subhadeep is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 17, 2010, 15:29
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Subhadeep
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 7
Subhadeep is on a distinguished road
small correction on my UU stress definition

Re UU stress = (1/N)Sum((U(i) - UMean)^2, {i,1,N}) and N is a very large number, say 10000
Subhadeep is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 18, 2010, 18:19
Default
  #9
f-w
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 129
Rep Power: 8
f-w is on a distinguished road
Yeah, too bad you can't specify Derived Parts as inputs to these monitors. I'll put in a feature request, so it might get implemented, in a year or so ..., in the meantime I'll think about it some more, good luck!
f-w is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:53.