CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > STAR-CCM+

Problem with implicit unsteady solver

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 2, 2010, 18:54
Default Problem with implicit unsteady solver
  #1
New Member
 
Haresh
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
CCMuser is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,
I have been using Star CCM+ for a past few months in order to simulate swirling flows in pipes. The geometry consists of a small rotating pipe interfaced with a honeycomb followed by a very long stationary pipe. The honeycomb is rotated too. For the rotation the "Moving reference frame model" is used.
At low rotation speeds and Reynolds nos. the steady flow model is used and an acceptable degree of convergence is obtained. However at high rotational speed the flow in the stationary pipe is not any more steady hence the steady solver is not of much use.
On using the implicit unsteady solver it is observed that the flow does not develop in the stationary pipe. The tangentioal velocity component shows that the effect of swirl dies out within 0.01D. Even after waiting for a long time there is no change in the profiles. There is something fishy about the unsteady solver since the steady and unsteady solvers show completely different profiles. The solution obtained with unsteady solver, as seen from the velocity contour plots, is such that the solver gets frozen after the interface and there is no development of flow, which is not possible.
I am stuck with this problem and also the CD Adapco Customer care is not able to solve this problem.
Can anyone think of a possible reason for this problem. Is there an error in the solver? Has anyone encountered a similar problem?
SOS!
CCMuser is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2010, 09:04
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Joern Beilke
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dresden
Posts: 185
Rep Power: 9
JBeilke is on a distinguished road
Just rotate the honeycomb mesh instead of using mrf.
JBeilke is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2010, 12:20
Default
  #3
f-w
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 129
Rep Power: 8
f-w is on a distinguished road
How large is your time-step relative to the rotation rate? Is your mesh fine enough to capture rotation downstream? What models are you using? Have you tried the Rigid Body Motion solver?

To speed thing up, initialize your unsteady solution with a steady one.
f-w is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFX 11 x64 solver? problem Attesz CFX 6 June 7, 2009 08:37
Coupled solver energy equation problem lucioantonio FLUENT 0 April 3, 2009 10:21
Steady and unsteady solver sam thompson FLUENT 1 April 20, 2006 12:39
Can I use coupled solver for this problem Frank FLUENT 0 April 11, 2006 06:28
CFX 5.6 memory problem with solver sreevisakh CFX 3 February 2, 2004 05:57


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:41.