CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > STAR-CCM+

Yacht Model Drag Analysis

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 27, 2010, 05:19
Default Yacht Model Drag Analysis
  #1
New Member
 
ZS
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 8
ziyasaydam is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,

I wonder if anyone has conducted sailing yacht drag analysis with multiphase option in STAR-CCM. I am comparing experimental results of different size models with my analysis in STAR-CCM.

My major problem in all these analysis is being unable to find the right wall treatment. After finding the right size of cells for the free surface, wake regions and surrounding regions of the hull, keel and rudder -all being the same size-, I keep halving the size of cells on the surfaces of the hull, keel and rudder (to decrease the Y+ values) until the solution becomes grid independent. Note that during this approach, I adjust the time step in order to obtain a Courant Number of around 1-10.

With this approach, different size and different geometry models become grid independent at very different Y+ values. On a 6 meter model case the solution became grid independent at Y+ values of ~500, whereas on a 2.4 meter model as I decrease the Y+ from 400 towards 50, I keep deviating from the experimental results...

Does anyone have an idea about possible reasons for inconsistencies in the results? My expectation was to see that the results get reasonably closer to experimental results as I decrase Y+ towards ~50...

Thanks in advance,

Ziya
ziyasaydam is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 27, 2010, 12:17
Default
  #2
Member
 
Vinicius Girardi
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 8
Vinicius is on a distinguished road
Hi Ziya,

For any drag calculation your Y+ value must be 1 or below...

Y+ between 30 and 300 are just an aproximation of the behavior of the boundary layer... if want to capture the drag, you must solve the boundary layer using the Y+ around 1...

Also, for VOF models, be sure to refine the mesh in the interface between the fluids..

Hope it helps..

Regards
Vinicius is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 28, 2010, 02:09
Default
  #3
New Member
 
ZS
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 8
ziyasaydam is on a distinguished road
Hi Vinicius,

Although it is an approximation, I tend to believe that the wall function approach should give reasonably accurate results with fewer number of cells compared to enhanced wall treatment. Considering the necessity of analysis in full scale as well (assume 30-40 meter long yachts), having a Y+ value of 1 would lead to number of cells impossible to handle within the available resources. Also, I am using Reynolds Stresses Model for turbulence and in some cases only high Y+ treatment is possible.

Therefore, the question becomes: Is there a best practice rule with wall functions in yacht drag analysis with VOF case?

Ziya
ziyasaydam is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 28, 2010, 09:12
Default
  #4
Member
 
Vinicius Girardi
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 8
Vinicius is on a distinguished road
I don't think you have to use the Reynolds stress model. A RANS k-omega should be enough... Are you using trimmed cells or polyhedral?
Vinicius is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 28, 2010, 09:29
Default
  #5
New Member
 
ZS
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 8
ziyasaydam is on a distinguished road
I am using trimmed cells in the model. Most of the work I have seen in this field makes use of RSM due to its suitability for streamline curvature of the flow.
ziyasaydam is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 8, 2010, 02:03
Default
  #6
New Member
 
toby
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 6
tobe is on a distinguished road
I have done quite a lot of hull modeling, at Fn=1 region, and find that the y+ has little impact, but cell size of the free surface is critical. We also don't use the Reynolds Stresses Model
tobe is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 8, 2010, 04:57
Default
  #7
New Member
 
ZS
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 8
ziyasaydam is on a distinguished road
If you are solving for drag, which turbulence model are you using?
ziyasaydam is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
drag calculation of a car model by phoenics mukut Phoenics 2 January 9, 2010 19:07
coupled field in shell model analysis chenwen521 ANSYS 0 September 28, 2009 22:32
CFD Analysis of Model Aircraft Sashankh FLUENT 0 December 1, 2008 23:49
CFX analysis of a sphere - drag too low Rob Findlay CFX 6 March 26, 2007 10:11
drag coefficient with k-eps model Mark Main CFD Forum 8 April 19, 2004 09:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:22.