|March 10, 2011, 13:29||
bionic bender vs. 90° reference bender
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9Rep Power: 7
i have simulated a real test about the pressure drop over an evulotionary developed bender (maeander bender) vs a reference 90° bender.
In the real test the maeander bender generated a pressure drop around 15-25% less the reference one.
I build the exact geometrie of both bender in starccm+, and reviewed both in some simulations with following specs:
1. K-Omega - SST, Low y+
2. K-Omega - SST, All y+
3. RSS - Linear Pressure Strain, Two Layer
I used in physic-continuum, gas - air, steady, segregated flow, 3-D and turbulent.
The Mesh is genereted to have an overall y+<1 with the low y+, and between 30<y+<60 with the all y+/two layer wall treatment.
My problem ist that in starccm the maeander bender creates a higher pressure drop then the reference bender, but this in confict to the real results.
I hope u can give me any explanation for this case.
|bender, flow, how to, mesh, problem|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|OpenFoam-1.7.x on Suse 11.2 (64bit) does not compile||val46||OpenFOAM Installation||4||August 27, 2010 03:43|
|Error with Wmake||skabilan||OpenFOAM Installation||3||July 28, 2009 00:35|
|OpenFOAM on MinGW crosscompiler hosted on Linux||allenzhao||OpenFOAM Installation||127||January 30, 2009 20:08|
|G95 + CGNS||Bruno||Main CFD Forum||1||January 30, 2007 01:34|
|Building OpenFoAm on SGI Altix 64bits||anne||OpenFOAM Installation||8||June 15, 2006 09:27|