CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > STAR-CCM+

Propeller Validation Case

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 9, 2011, 12:18
Default Propeller Validation Case
  #1
Member
 
John
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 93
Rep Power: 8
nomad is on a distinguished road
Has anybody looked at a propeller validation case in STAR CCM+?
In particular, I'm interested in Re<1e6 cases. In this regime, XROTOR gives way better results than CFD.

I've heard that torque and thrust results are typically 20%-50% off experimental results due to high dissipation in the code.

I'm running cases with both the unsteady Rigid Body Motion and steady state Moving Reference Frame solvers and different turbulence models, and none of them seem to work well. They do better at Re>1e6. I am also following the the best practice meshing guidlines (wall y+<1, stetching factor<1.25, LE/TE refinement, in-place interface >99% intersecting faces, and so on), and a small enough time step.

Thank you.
nomad is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 21:00
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Jen Menasha
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
jenny425 is on a distinguished road
Have you found a propeller to validate your simulation? What did you find out with your code? I'm in the same situation. Thanks!
jenny425 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 22:05
Default
  #3
Member
 
John
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 93
Rep Power: 8
nomad is on a distinguished road
I haven't found a commercial code that correctly predicts propeller thrust and torque. I have worked with the technical support guys at FLUENT, CFX and STAR CCM+ and although the thrust prediction comes to within 5%, the torque prediction is way off.

I have found however that OVERFLOW (NASA structured code) gives the right results for both thrust and torque to within 1-2% of experimental data. The learning curve is steep but manageable, although you have to be a US citizen in order to use the code.

Unfortunately, at this point in time, the excessive artificial dissipation in commercial codes prevents their use in rotorcraft performance prediction.
nomad is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
mrf, propeller, rbm, validation

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparison of axisymmetric case, Starccm+ and OpenFOAM linnemann OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 12 June 16, 2011 05:43
Changing the grid on the same set-up Katya FLUENT 12 October 8, 2009 16:31
Need help to open an OpenFoam case with Paraviw aaurouss OpenFOAM 2 July 6, 2009 13:18
Validation case for turbulent flow Ratan Main CFD Forum 0 October 4, 2005 03:03
Validation case for turbulent flow Ratan Main CFD Forum 0 October 4, 2005 03:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26.