CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > STAR-CCM+

Prism Layer Thickness

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 2, 2011, 00:12
Default Prism Layer Thickness
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: US
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 6
famerfamer is on a distinguished road
Hey,

I met a problem when working on the prism layer thickness. As shown in the picture, at the left part, there is an area with no prism layer because of the narrowing geometry. And the meshes themselves are not complete. The skewness angle in that area are pretty large.

A.So what should I do? Decreasing the base size in that narrowed area?

B.Is the prism layer thickness needed to be smaller than the geometry dimmension or there is no need to do that?

C. If I decrease the base size there, so the base size + the prism layer thickness should be equal or smaller than the geometry dimmension?

Any help would be appreciated!

Famerfamer
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mesh_view.jpg (80.7 KB, 233 views)
famerfamer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 2, 2011, 04:23
Default
  #2
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 7
Ladnam is on a distinguished road
You should try increase the # of points in gap in the surface proximity node.
But your prism layer seems too thick, or the geometry is very small. In that case it can maybe be simplified by removing the gaps.
Ladnam is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 2, 2011, 08:21
Default
  #3
Super Moderator
 
Ryne Whitehill
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 313
Rep Power: 9
rwryne is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by famerfamer View Post
Hey,

I met a problem when working on the prism layer thickness. As shown in the picture, at the left part, there is an area with no prism layer because of the narrowing geometry. And the meshes themselves are not complete. The skewness angle in that area are pretty large.

A.So what should I do? Decreasing the base size in that narrowed area?

B.Is the prism layer thickness needed to be smaller than the geometry dimmension or there is no need to do that?

C. If I decrease the base size there, so the base size + the prism layer thickness should be equal or smaller than the geometry dimmension?

Any help would be appreciated!

Famerfamer
Under Continua->Mesh->Models->Prism Layer Mesher:

1) change layer reduction percentage to 99.
2) change minimum thickness percent to .5
3) change gap fill to 45

These three values are at the extreme end of the spectrum. If this fixes your problem, you can likely play with their values (lower layer reduction percentage, raise minimum thickness percent, lower gap fill) and get it to still work
rwryne is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 2, 2011, 14:06
Default
  #4
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: US
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 6
famerfamer is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwryne View Post
Under Continua->Mesh->Models->Prism Layer Mesher:

1) change layer reduction percentage to 99.
2) change minimum thickness percent to .5
3) change gap fill to 45

These three values are at the extreme end of the spectrum. If this fixes your problem, you can likely play with their values (lower layer reduction percentage, raise minimum thickness percent, lower gap fill) and get it to still work
Thank you very much. But I'm still wondering if the thickness of prism layer should be smaller than the geometry gap. Because I'm using volumetric control to deal with this area or I don't need it at all? The prism layer thickness for areas around that gap is pretty large.

I appreciate your help.

Famerfamer
famerfamer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 2, 2011, 14:16
Default
  #5
Super Moderator
 
Ryne Whitehill
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 313
Rep Power: 9
rwryne is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by famerfamer View Post
Thank you very much. But I'm still wondering if the thickness of prism layer should be smaller than the geometry gap. Because I'm using volumetric control to deal with this area or I don't need it at all? The prism layer thickness for areas around that gap is pretty large.

I appreciate your help.

Famerfamer

With those settings, the mesher should chop the prism layer thickness down to fill the gap with mostly prism cells.

I have numerous areas like this in my geometry. They do not always come out with the highest quality, but a prism mesh usually does get generated there.
rwryne is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 2, 2011, 15:59
Default
  #6
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: US
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 6
famerfamer is on a distinguished road
Thanks! How about the core mesh size in those narrowed areas? For my case as shown in the priture, in that narrowed area, there are three parameters should be set properly, the prism layer thickness (Denoting a) for walls at each side and the core meshes in the middle (denoting b as the width or thickness of the mesh), correct? Denoting the distance of the gap is c.

Q:
A. So what's a proper relationship among a, b and c? 2a+b=c?
B. When I paly those three values you mentioned above, everytime I need to do the surface mesh repair and volume mesh for the whole big geometry when I change one value. So do you know have some better ideas dealing with this? Like only mesh those problematic areas and leave other area with a coarse mesh or something esle?

Thanks!
famerfamer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 2, 2011, 21:00
Default
  #7
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: US
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 6
famerfamer is on a distinguished road
oh, man, the total surface size increased from 5 million to more than 50 million after I adjusted those values although I also decreased base size of that area.

It seems that the 0.5 pecent is too small?
famerfamer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 3, 2011, 08:26
Default
  #8
Super Moderator
 
Ryne Whitehill
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 313
Rep Power: 9
rwryne is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by famerfamer View Post
oh, man, the total surface size increased from 5 million to more than 50 million after I adjusted those values although I also decreased base size of that area.

It seems that the 0.5 pecent is too small?
Those values I suggested for you to change should not affect surface size. They will only affect the prism layer.
rwryne is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 3, 2011, 14:41
Default
  #9
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: US
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 6
famerfamer is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwryne View Post
Those values I suggested for you to change should not affect surface size. They will only affect the prism layer.
Got you. That is, it only affects the # of cells for the volume mesh but not the # of of surface faces, correct? Thanks for your help!
famerfamer is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SnappyHexMesh - no layer added bejbro OpenFOAM Mesh Utilities 4 October 16, 2014 19:24
Boundary layer generation problems ivan_cozza OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 0 October 6, 2010 13:47
ICEM Prism Layer transition between surface with prism layers and one without TWaung ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 2 October 12, 2009 14:56
Trimmer & prism layer peresah STAR-CCM+ 6 October 6, 2009 14:39
errors Fahad Main CFD Forum 0 March 23, 2004 14:20


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:45.