CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > STAR-CCM+

Automatic exhaust valve closing simulation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 10, 2012, 02:42
Default Automatic exhaust valve closing simulation
  #1
Member
 
Hamza Motiwala
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 5
hamzamotiwala is on a distinguished road
Helo friends,

I am simulating the movement of exhaust valves. I am doing this using mesh morpher in v6.6(I dont have v7.2 installed on the cluster yet).

I define the valve as a solid region and the rest of the geometry as fluid. I set the morpher for solid to displacement and give no morphing to fluid region. I give in a table for the valve movement. I am testing it to move at every 5 seconds. so i divided the table into 1sec values. I change the value for only z coordinate for every 5 second by 1mm.

The problem is that till the first 5secs i.e. till the first displacement of 1mm everything is fine but afterwords it starts moving for every timestep by 1mm. I just dont get it.

The input table looks something like this:

t x y z
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
3 0 0 0
4 0 0 0
5 0 0 .001
6 0 0 .001
7 0 0 .001
8 0 0 .001
9 0 0 .001
10 0 0 .002

the another variation i tried was :

t x y z
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
3 0 0 0
4 0 0 0
5 0 0 .001
6 0 0 0
7 0 0 0
8 0 0 0
9 0 0 0
10 0 0 .001

this didnt work either. does anyone have any idea why it keeps moving by 1mm at every time step even when i define not to?

looking forward to some help.

thanks,
Hamza
hamzamotiwala is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 10, 2012, 08:10
Default
  #2
Member
 
Hamza Motiwala
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 5
hamzamotiwala is on a distinguished road
Hello all,

An update to the above problem. There is something wrong with the settings.

Why does my simulation not take the valves into consideration. I mean why does it flow through the valves rather than around it.

I have defined them as wall.

any help would be great.

then I will get back to the moving mesh thing.

thanks
Hamza
hamzamotiwala is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 11, 2012, 01:32
Default
  #3
Member
 
Hamza Motiwala
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 5
hamzamotiwala is on a distinguished road
valves detected.

Can someone now help me with a moving valve simulation please.

Thanks,
Hamza
hamzamotiwala is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 11, 2012, 03:17
Default create two different regions
  #4
New Member
 
Krishna
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 4
kri321shna is on a distinguished road
hello,
please try with this.

1.create the region for valves (it will create interfaces, or u can do manually), then ur problem will get solve.
2. right click on region and click on "split by Non-Contiguous"

then u can work?

plz inform if this working or not.
kri321shna is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 11, 2012, 07:30
Default
  #5
Member
 
Hamza Motiwala
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 5
hamzamotiwala is on a distinguished road
Hello Krishna,

I didnt really understand how that would help me with the automation of the valves.

thanks,
Hamza
hamzamotiwala is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 11, 2012, 08:19
Default
  #6
Member
 
Hamza Motiwala
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 5
hamzamotiwala is on a distinguished road
Hello once again everyone,

I got the valve to move in z direction using mesh morphing.

I need to move it 9mm in 9 steps.

After 5mm movement, I get an error saying that there are negative volume cells and the simulation stops.

How can I avoid this?

Is there any other way to simulate opening and closing valves in starccm+ ?

thanks,
Hamza
hamzamotiwala is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 11, 2012, 23:01
Default thin layer
  #7
New Member
 
Krishna
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 4
kri321shna is on a distinguished road
you can use thin layer concept, so that u can avoid negative volumes at valve close position.
kri321shna is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2012, 17:27
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 5
janko-hrasko is on a distinguished road
Hi,
what kind of motion do you use?

Currently I am working on motion of piston inside compressor and I have similar problems. I am using morphing in my problem and the solution for your first problem is I think selecting Total displacement in Physics values for your moving boundary.

So far I didnīt find out how to avoid negative volumes in my simulation. I canīt find any remeshing tool during timesteps, so the only way is to make good mesh or do you have any other proposal?
janko-hrasko is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 16, 2012, 09:03
Default
  #9
Member
 
Hamza Motiwala
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 5
hamzamotiwala is on a distinguished road
Hey,

Thanks for the advice. I will try that.

Although I was able to run the simulation by changing the thinner factor to 0.5. This way I avoided negative volumes but I think its only because by setting this factor low I chose to neglect a lot of cells in the region where morphing is carried out(atleast this is what I understood from it).

the mesh looks aweful. So I dont trust the results completely. (They do tend to tally to the Experimental results though)

I am still open to more suggestions and ideas.

Thanks,
Hamza
hamzamotiwala is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2012, 06:49
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 637
Rep Power: 11
abdul099 is on a distinguished road
To avoid negative volume cells, you should try to keep the displacement low for every time step, especially when you're compressing cells or shear them. Depending on the simulation, you also might put some boundaries to floating or in-plane (the latter one works only for planar boundaries).
But always keep in mind, you can't completely avoid negative volume cells. It often depends on the combination of the shape of the domain and the desired motion. E.g. you can't move one side of a very small gap for a very large displacement while the other side just sticks at it's position. In this case, you need to find an option how to move the "sticking" side or you need to remesh frequently.
abdul099 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ansys FSI and CFX (valve simulation) farianka ANSYS 0 April 17, 2011 16:20
Exhaust Manifold Transient Heat Transfer Simulation Jonny6001 STAR-CCM+ 8 March 23, 2011 12:39
SImulation of ventilators for supply and exhaust a Sebastian Main CFD Forum 0 July 19, 2006 08:15
Automatic post processing of Transient simulation Aziz CFX 2 June 24, 2005 14:37
3-D Contaminant Dispersal Simulation Apple L S Chan Main CFD Forum 1 December 23, 1998 10:06


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:32.