CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > STAR-CD

Star-CD with ParaView

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 28, 2009, 20:19
Default Star-CD with ParaView
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 8
usker is on a distinguished road
I was wondering if anyone tried to use Star-CD with ParaView for postprocessing?

Thanks
usker is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 29, 2009, 02:17
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Mark Olesen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: http://olesenm.github.io/
Posts: 777
Rep Power: 18
olesen will become famous soon enough
At the moment, the only reasonable path is to export the results as EnSight format, which is supported by paraview. You may need a somewhat newer paraview version (eg, from cvs) that has misc. bugfixes for the ensight reader.
olesen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 23, 2010, 01:43
Default paraview parallel processing
  #3
New Member
 
Carl Berger
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Baden, Switzerland
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 8
carl is on a distinguished road
Hello together,

I am not sure if I am in the right thread here, nevertheless:

I try postprocessing a Star-CD Case (actually saved as Ensight data)
with paraview 3.8.0, and I want to make it compute in parallel. I have
paraview already compiled with MPI and MESA support.

In first experiements are done on a 2-Core machine, I got as far as
this:

- in Paraview, connect to server
- Server setup as follows:
localhost, port 11111
Command: "mpirun -np 2 pvserver (optional: --off-screen-rendering)"

This is starting the 2 extra windows with (or without, respectively) the
rendered image.

The paraview processing works allright, yet the performance of the
parallel job is not any faster than when I just use paraview on a
single core, rather slightly slower. Neither can I find a significant
influence of the openGL-rendering, OK, so maybe my case is too simple
for that:

Case 1
paraview only: avg. 16 sec. / frame


Case 2
paraview client, server on localhost, "mpirun -np 2 pvserver"
rendering via openGL:
avg. 17 sec. / frame


Case 3
paraview client, server on localhost, "mpirun -np 2 pvserver"
off-screen-rendering:
avg. 17 sec. / frame


time documentation was done by via "save animation" and comparing the
timestamps, so they round to seconds. The animation was 5 frames long,
time per frame did not vary more than one sec.



Ideas that I have so far:

- parellizing does not help in my specific case (2-stroke engine,
moving mesh, filters are: "Cell Data to Point Data", slices and
iso-Surfaces), so I should use another testcase?

- the ENSIGHT reader is not parallelized?

- on a 2-core machine, effects are too small to be visible?

- do I need to decompose the computation domain somehow to tell
paraview how to seperate the data for the parallelization?

- computation time is very small compared to the time to fetch data
from ram, and since both cpus rely in the same ram, there is nearly
no speed-up?

- the whole thing is not properly parallelized and effectively uses
only one thread?


Next Steps:
Concerning the parallelized reader, I have read somewhere that the
OpenFOAM reader in paraview 3.8.0 is parallelzied, so I will try at least an OpenFOAM case. Do I need a decomposed case, or can I just take any case and take advantage of some automatic parallelization nontheless?

Is there any possibility to do some profiling of Paraview, like logging
the time a filter is taking, so to see at least where paraview
is taking the most time?

am I missing something else? any comments?

Thanks! Carl
carl is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Paraview installation troubles jjhall OpenFOAM Installation 3 April 17, 2008 12:59
Animating Lagrangian Particles in ParaView xiao OpenFOAM Paraview & paraFoam 4 April 8, 2008 02:24
error in star ccm maurizio CD-adapco 3 October 16, 2007 05:17
ParaView patch visualisation error in Development version philippose OpenFOAM Paraview & paraFoam 17 March 26, 2007 06:45
Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues michele OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 2 July 15, 2005 04:15


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39.