CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > STAR-CD

Fully developed flow in Star-cd

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 7, 2011, 03:53
Default Fully developed flow in Star-cd
  #1
SMM
New Member
 
Syed Murtuza Mehdi
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 6
SMM is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

Recently I uploaded a querry regarding fully developed flow in star-cd. I mentioned that the manuals clearly reveals that a fully developed flow in pipes and ducts can be modelled using uniform pressure boundary condition at the inlet and a specified mass flow rate at the exit which can be explicitly defined by OUTLET type of boundary condition in star. I further simulated the same problem in COMSOL as well and if I impose an inlet pressure of 1.9142Pa (calculated from the analytical expression available for steady laminar fully developed flows in pipes) and a zero pressure at the exit the COMSOL easily showed that the resulting flow is fully developed, however we can not use two pressure boundary conditions simultaneously in a fluid domain in star-cd, but still if we follow the manuals and impose a value of inlet pressure as given above and specify the mass flow rate at the exit the code should predict the fully developed flow but it is actually not and diverging significantly from the results of COMSOL.

Any experience on this issue??? May be the information in the manuals is insufficient I guess??? or may be entirely wrong.
SMM is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 8, 2011, 09:28
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Aroon
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Racine WI
Posts: 148
Rep Power: 8
vishyaroon is on a distinguished road
Hello Syed, for a fully developed flow (I guess you are using cyclic BCs), you can either assume a mass flow rate through the duct/pipe or the pressure drop. In most cases the primary outputs desired are the pressure drop or mass flow rate and hence you fix the other.

Is there a reason why you want to fix the inlet pressure? The inlet pressure should not matter as you may be interested in the pressure drop for a fully developed condition.
vishyaroon is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 8, 2011, 22:06
Default
  #3
SMM
New Member
 
Syed Murtuza Mehdi
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 6
SMM is on a distinguished road
Hi, Aroon

Thanks Aroon for the reply. Actually I have read in the manuals that cyclic boundary conditions imposes equal scalars at the geometrically same boundaries. By the word scalar I mean to say that it will impose same velocity components as well as pressure at the cyclic boundaries, but as u know that in a fully developed flow the velocity components remains the same along the length but pressure drops takes place hence the pressure cannot remain the same. In the manuals it is clearly written that one has to impose a uniform pressure at the inlet and a outlet b.c at exit with prescribed mass flow rate in order to simulate a fully developed flow in ducts and pipes (see Methodology manual chap 5 under the heading Fully Developed Flows version 4.14.014).

I followed the manuals and found out that the code needs some minor adjustments of the relaxation factors and no of sweeps for pressure corrector equation in this case for obtaining converged and stable solution for fully developed flows, however the results does not match fully with the theoretical results for example the computed friction factor shows a 1.5% error with the theoretical friction factor (f=64/Re).

Another issue is with the mesh in STAR-CD usually in laminar flows to resolve viscous B.L one needs to increase the grid density near the wall but I have found out that in STAR-CD if we use an arbitrary refined grid near the wall by keeping the no of radial cells fixed the computed results deteriorates (shows high error). Therfore I think that in STAR-CD we have to satisfy the R/38 criteria for the first wall adjacent cell height for laminar flows and find an optimal no of cells in the radial direction that gives the lowest error. Infact I have generated the mesh like this and achieved good results for developing flows.The same strategy works with developed flows as well. Do u have any suggestions on this???
SMM is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 9, 2011, 15:54
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Aroon
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Racine WI
Posts: 148
Rep Power: 8
vishyaroon is on a distinguished road
Hello Syed, Sorry about the misunderstanding. Never worked with this condition as we've always had some geometric feature in the streamwise direction preventing us from using this.
vishyaroon is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fully Developed Flow in Star-cd SMM STAR-CD 0 September 5, 2011 22:08
Fully Developed Flow at an Inlet Ed Mueller CFX 5 January 13, 2009 12:50
what is the fully developed fluid flow? charles CFX 7 November 13, 2006 10:48
udf for 3D laminar fully developed flow salman FLUENT 0 November 9, 2006 22:45
B. C. for Fully Developed flow?? M Kermani Main CFD Forum 10 November 9, 2000 20:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:56.