|February 27, 2014, 09:00||
[CFD-POST] How are gradients calculated?
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 26Rep Power: 5
I'm having trouble understanding how gradients are obtained by CFD-Post. I am running an adimensional problem in Fluent and I want to calculate the Nusselt number in CFD-Post. However, whenever I probe the temperature gradient on the pipe wall, Fourier's law is never obeyed. In other words:
probe(Wall Heat Flux)@wallPoint ≃ 1 (which is what is set up in Fluent, so it's OK), but
-probe(Thermal Conductivity)@wallPoint*probe(Temperature.Gradient )@wallPoint ≃ 0.719, which contradicts Fourier's law.
It's an axisymmetric problem (simple circular duct), so Temperature.Gradient Y ≃ Temperature.Gradient, but Fourier's law is not obeyed.
|March 26, 2014, 08:24||
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 273Rep Power: 13
CFD-Post uses shape functions to calculate gradients. They are detailed in the CFX documentation.
Fluent stores the results in the mesh elements/cells, whereas CFX stores them in the mesh nodes. So when CFD-Post read a Fluent result, it interpolates the cell values to nodes, and all calculations are then node-based (including the gradients based on shape functions). That is why you see a difference. Fluent, on the other hand, calculates them internally, but the temperature gradient calculated by Fluent is not available to CFD-Post by default.
You should always trust the solver computed values (Wall Heat Flux, Wall Shear, etc), not the one you manually computed.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|[CFD - Post] Discrepancy between areaInt of Pressure||ziggo||Visualization & Post-Processing||0||September 4, 2013 11:25|
|dsmcFoam setup||hherbol||OpenFOAM Pre-Processing||0||July 14, 2013 17:16|
|[CFD Post] Rescale the Viewer||max3.2||ANSYS||1||September 5, 2011 14:13|
|[CFD Post] Surface streamlines not located where needed||siw||CFX||1||July 7, 2011 19:13|
|[CFD Post] Displaying boundary layer profiles||siw||CFX||0||July 4, 2011 12:15|