# Incompressible flow

### From CFD-Wiki

Line 133: | Line 133: | ||

\frac{1}{\rho} \frac{\partial p}{\partial x_i} = \pi^I (-u_j \frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x_j} + \nu \Delta u_i), | \frac{1}{\rho} \frac{\partial p}{\partial x_i} = \pi^I (-u_j \frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x_j} + \nu \Delta u_i), | ||

</math> | </math> | ||

- | which result from the Helmholtz decomposition. <math>\pi^S</math> and <math>\pi^I</math> are the solenoidal and irrotational projection operators. | + | which result from the Helmholtz decomposition. <math>\pi^S</math> and <math>\pi^I</math> are the solenoidal (divergence-free) and irrotational projection operators. |

- | The governing equation for the velocity is pressure-free, calling into question the interpretation of the pressure as the enforcer of continuity. Rather, this equation should be considered a kinematic equation with continuity as a conservation law. The equation for the pressure as a functional of the velocity can be recognized as a form of the pressure poisson equation. | + | The divergence-free governing equation for the velocity is pressure-free, calling into question the interpretation of the pressure as the enforcer of continuity. Rather, this equation should be considered a kinematic equation with continuity as a conservation law. The equation for the pressure as a functional of the velocity can be recognized as a form of the pressure poisson equation. |

- | If expressions for the projection operators are inserted, it is clear that these are integro-differential equations, rather than the differential algebraic form of the composite equation. This inconvenience can be eliminated by use of the equivalent weak form, | + | If expressions for the projection operators are inserted, it is clear that these are integro-differential equations, rather than the differential-algebraic form of the composite equation. This inconvenience can be eliminated by use of the equivalent weak form, |

:<math> | :<math> | ||

- | (w_k,\frac{\partial u_i}{\partial t}) = -(w_k,u_j \frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x_j}) | + | (w_k,\frac{\partial u_i}{\partial t}) = -(w_k,u_j \frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x_j})+\nu ( \frac{\partial w_k}{\partial x_j}, \frac{-\partial u_i}{\partial x_j}) , |

</math> | </math> | ||

where the weight functions <math>w</math> are divergence-free. The function of the projection operator has been replaced by the orthogonality of solenoidal and irrotational function spaces. Cast in discrete form, this forms the basis for finite element computations. | where the weight functions <math>w</math> are divergence-free. The function of the projection operator has been replaced by the orthogonality of solenoidal and irrotational function spaces. Cast in discrete form, this forms the basis for finite element computations. | ||

+ | |||

+ | A question immediately comes to mind: If the governing equation does not involve the pressure, how does one specify boundary conditions for pressure-driven (Poiseuille) flow? A divergence-free field implies the existence of a stream function (or velocity potential in 3D) <math>\Psi</math> such that the velocity field is the curl of <math>\Psi</math>. Then specifying <math>\Psi</math> on the boundary determines the flow from the Stokes theorem. | ||

## Revision as of 18:45, 11 April 2011

A flow is said to be incompressible if the density of a fluid element does not change during its motion. It is a property of the flow and not of the fluid. The rate of change of density of a material fluid element is given by the material derivative

From the continuity equation we have

Hence the flow is incompressible if the divergence of the velocity field is identically zero. Note that the density field need not be uniform in an incompressible flow. All that is required is that the density of a fluid element should not change in time as it moves through space. For example, flow in the ocean can be considered to be incompressible even though the density of water is not uniform due to stratification.

Compressible flow can with good accuracy be approximated as incompressible for steady flow if the Mach number is below 0.3.

## Dimensional analysis

Assume is the characteristic length, is the characteristic velocity, the magnitude of velocity gradient is . The physical meaning of the incompressible flow is

or

It is know that

where is the sound speed. Hence, the incompressible condition is,

In general, for the liquid, and . So the question is that under what contion, the gas flow can be taken as incompressible flow?

We have

where is the body force (taken as gravitational force in the present document), is the stress tensor defined as,

where .

Then we can summarize as following,

- Steady incompressible flow

The steady flow can be taken as incompressible flow under the following conditions,

Then it arrives,

where .

If , holds; , so ( is the molecular free path) holds naturally for the continuous medium.

So for the steady flow, it can be taken as incompressible flow when , i.e. . In general, the flow will be taken as incompressible flow when .

- Unsteady incompressible flow

For unsteady flow, if , the flow is incompressible when . But if , it needs to figure out the condition. It is known that

Hence,

where is the characteristic time.

If , then , and we get

So for this case, the flow can be taken as incompressible flow when .

- Low speed atmospheric motion

For the atmospheric motion, one more condition is needed, , i.e. . But the characteristic length for the atmospheric motion is more than 10 km, the low speed atmospheric motion is not incompressible flow.

- Question for thinking: is the sound wave compresible or incompressible wave? Why?

## Governing Equations

The Navier-Stokes equations for incompressible flow are

- Continuity equation

- Momentum equation

- Energy equation

where

- is the Laplacian operator
- E is the internal energy per unit mass
- is the rate of dissipation of mechanical energy per unit mass

- is the kinematic viscosity
- k is the coefficient of thermal conductivity
- T is the temperature

However, the momentum equation is a composite equation, being the sum of the two equations,

which result from the Helmholtz decomposition. and are the solenoidal (divergence-free) and irrotational projection operators.

The divergence-free governing equation for the velocity is pressure-free, calling into question the interpretation of the pressure as the enforcer of continuity. Rather, this equation should be considered a kinematic equation with continuity as a conservation law. The equation for the pressure as a functional of the velocity can be recognized as a form of the pressure poisson equation.

If expressions for the projection operators are inserted, it is clear that these are integro-differential equations, rather than the differential-algebraic form of the composite equation. This inconvenience can be eliminated by use of the equivalent weak form,

where the weight functions are divergence-free. The function of the projection operator has been replaced by the orthogonality of solenoidal and irrotational function spaces. Cast in discrete form, this forms the basis for finite element computations.

A question immediately comes to mind: If the governing equation does not involve the pressure, how does one specify boundary conditions for pressure-driven (Poiseuille) flow? A divergence-free field implies the existence of a stream function (or velocity potential in 3D) such that the velocity field is the curl of . Then specifying on the boundary determines the flow from the Stokes theorem.

## Physical characteristics

A consequence of incompressible flow is that there is no equation of state for pressure, unlike in compressible flow. Since there is no separate equation for pressure, it must be obtained from the continuity and momentum equations. The main role of pressure is to satisfy the zero divergence condition of the velocity field. Note that pressure is only determined up to a constant.

If the viscosity is assumed to be constant, then the energy equation is decoupled from the continuity and momentum equations.