CFD Online URL
[Sponsors]
Home > Wiki > Talk:FAQ's

Talk:FAQ's

From CFD-Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: The FAQ's for codes are currently divided according to the company. Perhaps we should change this to instead be a separate FAQ for each code? Now that Ansys owns both CFX, FLUENT and ICEM ...)
 
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The FAQ's for codes are currently divided according to the company. Perhaps we should change this to instead be a separate FAQ for each code? Now that Ansys owns both CFX, FLUENT and ICEM is isn't very convenient to have an Ansys FAQ which covers all these codes. A code specific FAQ is more convenient to use and will survive consolidation deals when companies bye a code from another company. We can also create FAQ sections for each company that answers general questions and contains links to the specific code FAQ's. What do you think? --[[User:Jola|Jola]] 03:48, 7 June 2007 (MDT)
The FAQ's for codes are currently divided according to the company. Perhaps we should change this to instead be a separate FAQ for each code? Now that Ansys owns both CFX, FLUENT and ICEM is isn't very convenient to have an Ansys FAQ which covers all these codes. A code specific FAQ is more convenient to use and will survive consolidation deals when companies bye a code from another company. We can also create FAQ sections for each company that answers general questions and contains links to the specific code FAQ's. What do you think? --[[User:Jola|Jola]] 03:48, 7 June 2007 (MDT)
 +
 +
: At a glance, it looks like the Ansys FAQ is mainly a CFX FAQ.  I think it would probably be more accurate to call it a CFX FAQ - and since there is a CFX forum, it makes more sense also.  Other FAQ sections could be added as needed (as usual). --[[User:Jasond|Jasond]] 15:03, 7 June 2007 (MDT)
 +
 +
:: Okay, I think that I will start to divide the code FAQ's into separate codes then unless you or someone else object. The Fluent FAQ is already getting a bit big so having FLUENT, Gambit, Flowizard and all their other codes in one FAQ makes no sence. --[[User:Jola|Jola]] 15:53, 7 June 2007 (MDT)

Latest revision as of 21:53, 7 June 2007

The FAQ's for codes are currently divided according to the company. Perhaps we should change this to instead be a separate FAQ for each code? Now that Ansys owns both CFX, FLUENT and ICEM is isn't very convenient to have an Ansys FAQ which covers all these codes. A code specific FAQ is more convenient to use and will survive consolidation deals when companies bye a code from another company. We can also create FAQ sections for each company that answers general questions and contains links to the specific code FAQ's. What do you think? --Jola 03:48, 7 June 2007 (MDT)

At a glance, it looks like the Ansys FAQ is mainly a CFX FAQ. I think it would probably be more accurate to call it a CFX FAQ - and since there is a CFX forum, it makes more sense also. Other FAQ sections could be added as needed (as usual). --Jasond 15:03, 7 June 2007 (MDT)
Okay, I think that I will start to divide the code FAQ's into separate codes then unless you or someone else object. The Fluent FAQ is already getting a bit big so having FLUENT, Gambit, Flowizard and all their other codes in one FAQ makes no sence. --Jola 15:53, 7 June 2007 (MDT)
My wiki