# Talk:Turbulence free-stream boundary conditions

(Difference between revisions)
 Revision as of 23:09, 18 April 2006 (view source)Jola (Talk | contribs)← Older edit Latest revision as of 07:01, 7 February 2013 (view source)Tikulju (Talk | contribs) (3 intermediate revisions not shown) Line 1: Line 1: Someone should double check the formulas here! It is easy to make a misstake and I typed them in from my head after midnight... :-) --[[User:Jola|Jola]] 17:09, 18 April 2006 (MDT) Someone should double check the formulas here! It is easy to make a misstake and I typed them in from my head after midnight... :-) --[[User:Jola|Jola]] 17:09, 18 April 2006 (MDT) + + I tried to modify the omega equation, but for some reason it is not created. In the original text C_\mu was forgotten. + - Timo + + We had a permission error on a directory that has now been fixed. I do not think that the correction you did is correct though. C_mu should not be in that formula I think. What reference did you have that said C_mu should be there? We went through these formulas in detail when we wrote the [http://www.cfd-online.com/Tools/turbulence.php turbulence properties] tool. --[[User:Peter|Peter]] 11:23, 6 February 2013 (MST) + + Ok, seemed to be my bad. The formula is correct indeed. I'll try to be more careful next time and double check my references. - Timo

## Latest revision as of 07:01, 7 February 2013

Someone should double check the formulas here! It is easy to make a misstake and I typed them in from my head after midnight... :-) --Jola 17:09, 18 April 2006 (MDT)

I tried to modify the omega equation, but for some reason it is not created. In the original text C_\mu was forgotten. - Timo

We had a permission error on a directory that has now been fixed. I do not think that the correction you did is correct though. C_mu should not be in that formula I think. What reference did you have that said C_mu should be there? We went through these formulas in detail when we wrote the turbulence properties tool. --Peter 11:23, 6 February 2013 (MST)

Ok, seemed to be my bad. The formula is correct indeed. I'll try to be more careful next time and double check my references. - Timo