|
[Sponsors] |
[ANSYS Meshing] Is always finer mesh got better result? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 4, 2012, 19:32 |
Is always finer mesh got better result?
|
#1 |
New Member
Yangyang
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi everyone,
I try to simulate the effect of surface roughness in duct flow. I am using realizable k-e with enhanced wall treatment. Is always finer mesh got better result? I read fluent manul, y+ should be ~1. Is this arcurate if wall mesh are very fine (that said y+~0.1)? I don't consider the compute time and memory. thanks |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap | bobburnquist | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | August 26, 2015 10:38 |
Accuracy problem of HO schemes on unstructured mesh, HO scheme gives 1st order result | gemini | Main CFD Forum | 12 | December 27, 2011 22:01 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 22:11 |
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file | SSL | FLUENT | 2 | January 26, 2008 12:55 |
basic of mesh refinement | arya | CFX | 4 | June 19, 2007 13:21 |