CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ANSYS Meshing] Why doesn't ANSYS Meshing allow me to make a very fine mesh?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By ali.qasim
  • 1 Post By scipy

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 21, 2012, 12:04
Default Why doesn't ANSYS Meshing allow me to make a very fine mesh?
  #1
New Member
 
Ali
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: India
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 13
ali.qasim is on a distinguished road
I'm trying to make a C-mesh over an airfoil.

The first image shows my original mesh. But when I try to increase the bias factor or the number of divisions, so as to improve the resolution near the airfoil, I get the second image.

Any idea why this is happening?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.jpg (60.8 KB, 62 views)
File Type: jpg 2.jpg (69.4 KB, 54 views)
James Hetfield likes this.

Last edited by ali.qasim; May 21, 2012 at 12:07. Reason: attached images
ali.qasim is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 22, 2012, 04:50
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
scipy's Avatar
 
Alex Pasic
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Croatia
Posts: 199
Rep Power: 15
scipy is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to scipy
For mapped face to work, you have to increase the bias/number of divisions on all Edge sizing functions. U've probably been following the Cornell airfoil in WB tutorial, so, just increase the number of divisions on the left part too (C grid) so it'll have the same number of divisions as the wake part on the right.
PSYMN likes this.
scipy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 25, 2012, 20:11
Default Inflation
  #3
New Member
 
Ricardo
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 13
ricardo.costa is on a distinguished road
Hi ali.qasim,

By doing what our friend said about increasing the number of elements probably you will find a solution for the related problem.

Have you tried to built some inflation layers on this aerodynamic profile? I am trying to do this, but I cant find a solution.

Thanks,

Ricardo

Quote:
Originally Posted by ali.qasim View Post
I'm trying to make a C-mesh over an airfoil.

The first image shows my original mesh. But when I try to increase the bias factor or the number of divisions, so as to improve the resolution near the airfoil, I get the second image.

Any idea why this is happening?
ricardo.costa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 26, 2012, 05:48
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Ali
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: India
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 13
ali.qasim is on a distinguished road
scipy: Thanks. That did work up to an extent, but the problem came up again when I wanted more biasing. I guess I'll have to just start learning ICEM-CFD.

ricardo: I haven't tried inflation layers. Will do so and let you know if the problem is solved.
ali.qasim is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 26, 2012, 07:04
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Ali
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: India
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 13
ali.qasim is on a distinguished road
Just realized inflation won't work as the domain is divided into four faces around the airfoil.
ali.qasim is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
bias factor, fine, mesh

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gambit problems Althea FLUENT 22 January 4, 2017 04:19
OpenFOAM 1.7.1 installation problem on OpenSUSE 11.3 flakid OpenFOAM Installation 16 December 28, 2010 09:48
ANSYS Meshing - DC Mesh Quality alven299 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 5 July 19, 2010 12:34
[Commercial meshers] How to make a good Low-Re Mesh ? Gearb0x OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 0 February 12, 2010 05:48
Convergence moving mesh lr103476 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 November 19, 2007 15:09


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:53.