I also have a question. If I checked the model, for example the surface after import the igs file into ICEM and it is said that one surface is checked to have a problem. What should i do to repair the surface?
|
1 Attachment(s)
Hi, I solved the problem of the mess mesh. But the mesh quality is still bad. So far, I don't know what the problem it is.
|
attach blocking
|
attach blocking?
|
Yes. .blk file....
|
1 Attachment(s)
I am so sorry. It is 3 am in my region. So, just a little tired. I attached a new file now.Thank you!
|
Hi, Far. I think I found what the problem exsits. I tried to change the outlet to the upper surface to make the inlet not too close to the outlet. And the convergence is better than before. And I guess the uncrtucted mesh I generated is good enough for the fluent calculation. So, as you said, it is not the problem of the tetro mesh, it is the problem of the geometry. But the structed mesh is also bad. But anyway, could you give me a detailed explanation about the idea you said " extend the inlet and outlet domain and apply slip BOCO on them and record the data at the original inlet and outlet planes. " Thank you so so much for your help. I am looking forward to your reply.
Best Wishes! |
keep the inlet and outlet in your geometry, in the meshing tab, declare them as "internal wall". Now, extend your outlet. In fluent, the extended outlet will be the real outlet, and the outlet that you declared internal wall will be interior.
The extension is for a stability in the calculation, you are more intererested in knowing what's going wrong in your outlet (interior one). you kept it interior so you can visualize it easily in the post processing. am i clear enough ??? let me know... |
Hey Ali
Lets try our skills of hexa meshing on this geometry. What do you say? @yuhehuan If you apply the no slip boundary condition on the extended domain then you will have the extra effects of the boundary layer growth and which are not present in the original geometry. |
@far i will , i'm a little bit busy right now... we keep in touch
|
could you get a good blocking so far ??
|
Quote:
|
it worked for one geometry but not the other. trying to investigate the problem more... i realized that the one in which it didn't work had a bad geometry... I'll try everything once again this week end.
|
Hi, Ali. I am sorry I didn't completely understand your idea. I tried to extend the outlet surface using "extend surface" command. But I am not sure which sub-command shoud be used. Need I extend both inlet and outlet in ICEM or in FLUENT? Thank you so much!
Regards! Rong Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
I tried to extend the inlet and outlet of my geometry. But I am not sure it's correct. Is is like this after extended?
|
yes that's was i was reffering to, may be more if you can handle large large element. keep your original outlet. declare them as internal wall, and export them as interior...
|
Hi, Ali. I tried to defined the inlet and outlets as internal walls. But I am not sure how to define. Do I just name it? I divided mesh on the whole geometry after extend the inlet and outlets. The result is as the following picture. Do I just need to divide mesh on the original mesh and split mesh on the internal walls or divide mesh on the geometry including the extension part? Many thanks!
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:50. |