CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ANSYS Meshing] Problem with meshing a complex Geometry (Hex)

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 22, 2012, 14:50
Unhappy Problem with meshing a complex Geometry (Hex)
  #1
New Member
 
Pete Drum
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 14
fluent_beiyo is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone,
I just started to work with CFD Fluent and have a few Problems now with the meshing. I have to do a windenergypotential analysis for a building on my College campus. The Task is to make sort of a tutorial for other people, so that they have a better starting point.

My Professor wants me to mesh the Geometry with Hexaeders. The Problem is now that the Geometry is very complex and there are still some tetraeders in the mesh, especially around the building, which is bad because that are the important zones. I have really no clue how to mesh the Geometry, so that the quality is good enough. Here is a photo of the actual meshing and the problem zones.

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/96/bild6r.gif/

the big cuboid is of course the enveloping body. I did that with the boolean operation and sliced the Result in the middle, so that you can see the problem zones.

I meshed that with Hexadominant, because there were no sweepable bodies available. Anyone an idea, how to solve that problem?

Thank you very much
fluent_beiyo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 23, 2012, 21:57
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
diamondx's Avatar
 
Ghazlani M. Ali
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 1,385
Blog Entries: 23
Rep Power: 29
diamondx will become famous soon enough
if you want to mesh it with hexa, you can get better control by using icem cfd.
It's difficult to get hexa in ansys meshing if you don't have sweepable bodies....
__________________
Regards,
New to ICEM CFD, try this document --> https://goo.gl/KAOIwm
Ali
diamondx is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 24, 2012, 04:02
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 97
Rep Power: 14
Sixkillers is on a distinguished road
Quote:
I meshed that with Hexadominant, because there were no sweepable bodies available. Anyone an idea, how to solve that problem?
Start slicing your geometry in DM until each volume become sweepable. In addition you should have all these volumes into one part, so you will have conformal mesh.
Sixkillers is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 24, 2012, 08:31
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Pete Drum
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 14
fluent_beiyo is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by diamondx View Post
if you want to mesh it with hexa, you can get better control by using icem cfd.
It's difficult to get hexa in ansys meshing if you don't have sweepable bodies....
Hey ,
thanks for your answers. Yes I already heard that meshing with hexa in ansys meshing isn't working very good, but we dont have the possibility to use icem cfd.

@sixkillers
could you explain how to do that, in a more detailed way? I dont know how to slice the Building exactly - here is another picture of the geometry:

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/196/geometryc.jpg/



Thank your very much!

Edit: Referring to the first picture that i posted, how can I generate an Inflation Layer between the Building (Hexa) and the "Air" (Tetra)around the building??

Last edited by fluent_beiyo; October 24, 2012 at 10:41.
fluent_beiyo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2012, 03:20
Default
  #5
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 97
Rep Power: 14
Sixkillers is on a distinguished road
Hi!

Here are some tips:

1) Hexa dominant method in ANSYS Meshing isn't designed for CFD, but for FEA.

2) When you are doing external aero your computational domain (fluid domain) has to be large enough, so your final solution wont be affected by boundary conditions. What I see on the first picture is completely unacceptable. Your fluid box should be almost 10 larger that your build in each dimension.

3) As was mentioned earlier you have to divide your fluid domain into several swepable bodies to use method sweep. The most common way to do that is by using command slice (by surface) in DM. But before doing that I would simplify your building by merging several smaller faces into a larger one (command merge in DM).

4) For a sweep method boundary layer can be simply done by specifying bias factor and refining cells near a surface.

5) If you don't what to bother with creation of mesh too much. Just create your fluid domain in DM (again large enough) and load agdb file into ICEM CFD and create a tet mesh with hexa elements in core (chech Create Hexa-Core in ICEM). Definitely watch this two youtube tutorials:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdUjp...feature=relmfu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1Yw_...feature=relmfu
Sixkillers is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 6, 2012, 09:28
Default
  #6
Far
Senior Member
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,558
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 54
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
did you make the mesh?
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 8, 2012, 09:36
Default
  #7
Member
 
Tamil Nadu
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 14
nkme2007 is on a distinguished road
Hi...

Mine is also a similar problem in meshing with GAMBIT. I want to model a building in GAMBIT 3D. Finally, aim of my project is to simulate the temperatures of the walls of building when water flows through pipes inserted in the ceiling (using Ansys Fluent). Is it possible to solve??
nkme2007 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 11, 2012, 09:33
Default
  #8
Far
Senior Member
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,558
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 54
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Hey

Are you still working on it. Any progress!

I am working on it. Wanted to ask can you simplify some details (Fig. 4)?

You want to mesh it inside or outside this domain?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg building1.jpg (44.5 KB, 124 views)
File Type: jpg building2.jpg (64.0 KB, 112 views)
File Type: jpg building3.jpg (58.8 KB, 93 views)
File Type: jpg building4.jpg (45.8 KB, 71 views)
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 26, 2014, 05:55
Default FATAL error in meshing
  #9
New Member
 
mechatronicstudent
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
mechatronicstudent is on a distinguished road
hello everybody!
I'm new in ANSYS. I have some problems in modeling & meshing.
I'm trying with : ANSYS15-x64 and in Mechanical APDL.
my system is : Intel core(i5) 2.27 with 4G RAM.
O.S : Windows 8-x64.
I create this rectangle :
wp x = 0
wp y = 0
width = 2
height = 1
I meshed it in default mode. with PLANE55 element.
Then I could Extrude it in " Cylindrical " Active C.S & with SOLID278 with " Extrude Area by XYZ" tool.
It meshed & Extruded exactly.
MY PROBLEM IS :
But when I'm trying to Extrude it in " Cylindrical-Y " Active C.S it happens this error :

*** FATAL *** CP = 4.094 TIME= 12:30:54
An allocation was made with a negative length requested: -8
Filename:..\src\FEM_advFront.cpp Linenum:3032.

I'll be so grateful if any one can help me.
mechatronicstudent is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[GAMBIT] Meshing complex geometry (Hull) vmeertens ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 26 March 29, 2010 11:24
[GAMBIT] complex geometry meshing 1682333 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 7 August 31, 2009 13:44
Simulation of Flow through Complex 3D Geometry EmersonKB CFX 5 July 2, 2009 09:17
Meshing a complex geometry AJG FLUENT 2 June 29, 2005 09:39
unstructured vs. structured grids Frank Muldoon Main CFD Forum 1 January 5, 1999 11:09


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:30.