Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[GAMBIT] Quad pave is better!

Mark Forums Read

Reply

Search this Thread

December 27, 2012, 00:58	Quad pave is better!	#1
Prateek garg Member Prateek Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Bangalore Posts: 32 Rep Power: 14	Hi everyone, As we all know, structured meshing is better than unstructured one, but I want to how Quad pave is better scheme of meshing than other unstructured schemes like tri pave, or quad/tri Pave??

Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
[ICEM] Transition layers from quad (or hexa) coarse mesh to quad (or hexa) fine mesh?	macfly	ANSYS Meshing & Geometry	4	February 10, 2014 06:09
Parallel computing quad core	Prad	Main CFD Forum	13	February 9, 2009 14:28
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file	SSL	FLUENT	2	January 26, 2008 11:55
Questions about CPU's: quad core, dual core, etc.	Tim	FLUENT	0	February 26, 2007 14:02
need paper for Quad element Pave method	phsieh2005	Main CFD Forum	0	April 8, 2006 22:23

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:42.