CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ANSYS Meshing] Inlet Pump - Creation of sweepable bodies

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By jrunsten

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 24, 2013, 06:06
Default Inlet Pump - Creation of sweepable bodies
  #1
New Member
 
Martin
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 13
DarkRudy is on a distinguished road
Hello,

my name is Martin and I'm new to this forum. I've started working with Ansys Workbench a couple of weeks ago und now I'm having some problems with a small project. I hope you can help me with that.
I would like to simulate a flow at the entrance of a pump. I have designed a simplified model of the flow channel with the ansys design-modeler. This one you can see in the picture, which i have attached.

1. The fluid enters at the bottom of the annular chanal.
2. ... then it flows trough the four inclined, small tubes to the 3rd section of the model.
3. The fluid leaves the model at the top area of the cylinder in the middle.
4. I have cut the whole system along the longitudinal axis.

When I open the system to create the mesh, the programm shows me that every body is sweepable. But for the simulation I want to define only "one entry" and "one exit" ( in addition to that the nodes and edges on the contact surfaces should be identical between the individual bodies), so I put the bodies together to one assembly. Now only the small connecting channels are sweepable. Is there a way to get this assembly sweepable? Or is the geometry too complex? How do I deal with this problem?
I have read that the sweep-method is advantageous for such flow simulations, but which alternative can I use, if this method can not be applied to the bodies? The mesh of the net should be very fine to examine the movement of particles or bubbles.

Mhh, I hope, I did not forget anything. Thank your very much for your help.

Kind Regards
Martin
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Pumpe_Eingang.JPG (41.5 KB, 71 views)
Attached Files
File Type: zip pump.zip (56.2 KB, 8 views)
DarkRudy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 24, 2013, 06:22
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,398
Rep Power: 46
flotus1 has a spectacular aura aboutflotus1 has a spectacular aura about
Remember to freeze the bodies before forming an assembly.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 24, 2013, 08:25
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Josef Runsten
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 188
Rep Power: 23
jrunsten will become famous soon enough
Send a message via MSN to jrunsten
The fact that you have formed a part from all your bodies creates imprints of the small tubes on the faces of the big ones:



If you explode the part it will be sweepable. You will end up with separate bodies with nodes not matching, so you will then need to set up interfaces between them.

jrunsten is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 25, 2013, 13:33
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Martin
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 13
DarkRudy is on a distinguished road
...wow, thx for your help and the fast answers. Unfortunately I am only able to work on it at my university. So I will try it on monday and then I can give a feedback. Have a nice weekend!
DarkRudy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 28, 2013, 07:55
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Martin
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 13
DarkRudy is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your help so far.
@ flotus1: I guess, that the DM automatically creates the frozen bodies, when I separate them with the function “slice”. In the tree outline all bodies are marked with that “icecube”-symbol. Nevertheless I have recreated the parts with the function “Add frozen”. But it doesn’t change the fact, that the created assembly is not sweepable.
@ jrunsten: What do you mean with setting up interfaces between them?
DarkRudy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 28, 2013, 07:58
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Josef Runsten
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 188
Rep Power: 23
jrunsten will become famous soon enough
Send a message via MSN to jrunsten
I mean in the solver (Fluent, CFX etc), you need to set up interfaces between the bodies, since the mesh is not connected node by node. This also means that the inflation layers at these interfaces wont be continuos. Now I'm just talking about sweep meshing here, since that's what you asked about. You could also tet mesh the entire thing, or go into ICEM and create a nice hex mesh.
DarkRudy likes this.
jrunsten is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inlet Wall to Inlet Patch kurne OpenFOAM 4 January 23, 2013 06:23
[swak4Foam] Trouble setting groovyBC interFoam Inlet BC mgdenno OpenFOAM Community Contributions 4 July 1, 2012 08:16
inlet and outlet boundary condition of pump Thammasak CFX 0 February 9, 2004 13:02
Inlet diffuser of ramjet Mohammad Kermani Main CFD Forum 25 December 29, 2000 18:46
length scales at inlet for internal flows Anne-Marie Giroux Main CFD Forum 3 July 5, 1999 21:28


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:00.