CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[Workbench] [Autodyn and Explicit Dynamics]

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 31, 2013, 05:51
Default [Autodyn and Explicit Dynamics]
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6
tjingwei is on a distinguished road

How do I resolve overlapped mesh in Explicit Dynamics?

I had imported a complex CAD model (with many parts) into Explicit Dynamics to mesh, before exporting it to AUTODYN.

Under AUTODYN "interaction" button, I clicked on the “Check” function and it returns with “there are initial penetration".

I know this can be easily resolved if I have Design Modeler, by:
a)Group all Bodies into a single Part
b)Set the Shared Topology Method for the Part to “None”
c)In Meshing, insert Match Control objects scoped to the contact surfaces (This step may not be necessary if a single global element size is used)

I do not have DM. So is there any other method to resolve this?

Thanks in advance.
tjingwei is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 1, 2013, 04:20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 531
Rep Power: 16
siw will become famous soon enough
Since you don't have DesignModeler you should simplify the geometry in the CAD package it was made in.

I use ANSYS Explicit STR (the Workbench integrated Autodyn Lagrangian solver) and one of the first things I was told on the product demostration (the ANSYS Customer Portal has lots on explicit dynamics and it's meshing needs) was that explicit dynamics models should be simplified as much as possible (e.g. use surface and line bodies, omit parts if possible but certainly their details), mainly because the timestep (and hence simulation time) is driven by the minimum cell size.

Explicit dynamics models should not be treated like implicit FEA models, as an example see

So I don't think you should fix the overlapped mesh but rather simplify the geometry and then regenerate the mesh.
siw is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 5, 2013, 03:08
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6
tjingwei is on a distinguished road
Thank you. I will take note of that.
tjingwei is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Explicit vs Implicit VOF in Fluent MachZero FLUENT 5 August 7, 2013 18:17
Explicit method for more than two phases sachinthakre FLUENT 1 February 17, 2011 13:07
Euler (explicit or implicit) anybody Main CFD Forum 2 May 8, 2006 02:12
LES (explicit) filtering John Main CFD Forum 2 July 29, 2004 18:03
explicit formulation Phonics User Phoenics 0 December 10, 2003 14:07

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:18.