CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[GAMBIT] mesh to capture boundary layer

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 9, 2014, 04:50
Default mesh to capture boundary layer
  #1
New Member
 
Arvindh
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 12
Arvin is on a distinguished road
Hi, I want to capture the boundary layer developed in natural convection phenomena in a cube geometry with flux supplied at bottom of cube. I want more mesh near the bottom of cube and coarse mesh at top. I tried by creating two volumes and meshed separately but it doesn't work in fluent.

Please provide me with a solution. I would really appreciate your time and effort.Thanks!!
Arvin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 9, 2014, 08:17
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
ghost82's Avatar
 
Rick
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,016
Rep Power: 26
ghost82 will become famous soon enough
Hi,
you can use boundary layer:

http://combust.hit.edu.cn:8080/fluen...301.htm#mg0301

Or size functions:

https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Gam...ide/mg0502.htm

No need to create 2 volumes.

What does it mean "but it doesn't work in fluent"??

Daniele
ghost82 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 9, 2014, 08:44
Default hi
  #3
New Member
 
Arvindh
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 12
Arvin is on a distinguished road
Hi Daniele, I tried using boundary layer mesh. I want to pack 1000 rows in a depth of say 15 units. But, Gambit crashes whenever I try to do that. I am able to pack 190 rows within depth of 5 units only with growth factor of 1. After that any change causes Gambit to crash. Why is that?

Heat flux must be supplied at bottom face of my geometry.But when I load the double volume mesh file, flux gets applied in the interior wall which I created to separate the two volumes. I defined the type of that wall as interior and also checked my grid and boundary conditions, but flux keeps getting applied to interior wall. That is the volume which I meshed densely doesn't get solved. Why is that?

Thanks!!
Arvin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 9, 2014, 08:52
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
ghost82's Avatar
 
Rick
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,016
Rep Power: 26
ghost82 will become famous soon enough
Maybe you have "problems" with hardware (low amount of ram or similar)..
So split your volume ("the big cube") by a face and let connected the 2 volumes, so that the face which divides the 2 volumes is shared by both volumes.
Don't assign any boundary condition to that internal face, it will automatically detected in fluent as an internal face.

Daniele
ghost82 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 10, 2014, 02:13
Default
  #5
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
As Daniele mentionned it sounds like a hardware issue.
You wrote that you were able to mesh your model with 190 rows. In this case how many cells do you have in your domain, and how much RAM do you have on your hardware?
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 10, 2014, 09:22
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Arvindh
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 12
Arvin is on a distinguished road
Hi Daniele, I didn't assign any boundary condition to that internal face but still the flux gets applied to the top face instead of bottom face. I meshed the volume below the interior densely since I am supplying flux to bottom face only. I can't understand what is the problem.
Arvin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 10, 2014, 09:23
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Arvindh
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 12
Arvin is on a distinguished road
Hi Max
I have 3,45,600 hex cells and my RAM is 4GB.
Arvin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 10, 2014, 12:02
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
ghost82's Avatar
 
Rick
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,016
Rep Power: 26
ghost82 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arvin View Post
Hi Daniele, I didn't assign any boundary condition to that internal face but still the flux gets applied to the top face instead of bottom face. I meshed the volume below the interior densely since I am supplying flux to bottom face only. I can't understand what is the problem.
upload the cas file somewhere and I will look at it.
ghost82 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 11, 2014, 00:34
Default
  #9
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arvin View Post
Hi Max
I have 3,45,600 hex cells and my RAM is 4GB.
If you are working on windows OS, there is no real 64-bit version of Gambit. That means Gambit is limited on RAM (especially if you are trying to mesh your domain on the fly, eg just one volume)
As Daniele mentionned, you may try to split your volume, for giving Gambit any chance to mesh your BL without crashing, for instance isolate your BL region as a volume and mesh it again with more than 190 rows)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wind turbine simulation Saturn CFX 58 July 3, 2020 01:13
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap bobburnquist OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 6 August 26, 2015 09:38
An error has occurred in cfx5solve: volo87 CFX 5 June 14, 2013 17:44
Grid Independence of Boundary layer Luigi_ Main CFD Forum 0 December 14, 2011 13:42
RPM in Wind Turbine Pankaj CFX 9 November 23, 2009 04:05


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13.