CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ANSYS Meshing] Meshing a long and narrow tube

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By Antanas

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 26, 2014, 03:33
Default Meshing a long and narrow tube
  #1
New Member
 
Zaid
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Autonomic is on a distinguished road
Hi

I'm new to CFD and I'm trying to mesh a tube geometry with a cross section of 500 square micrometres and a length of 30 cm.

I started with a tube of only 0.1cm length just to test the settings with and with the physics preference set to CFD and the automatic method, the mesh generated was quite nice:

http://i.imgur.com/YJ9cEMB.jpg

I then tried the full 30cm length tube using the same settings, but the mesh is much lower quality:

http://i.imgur.com/o6RJsy9.jpg

I have only a limited understanding of ANSYS of meshing techniques but I assumed that increasing the length of the model wouldn't reduce the quality so much.

I'd love to know which settings I need to change in order to get a mesh similar to that of the smaller length tube. If any more information is needed please let me know.

Thanks
Autonomic is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2016, 01:50
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Joyce
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9
Joyce is on a distinguished road
Hi!
Have you solved this problem? I have the same one as your.
THX
Joyce is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2016, 04:17
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 18
Antanas is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joyce View Post
Hi!
Have you solved this problem? I have the same one as your.
THX
What's the problem?
Antanas is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2016, 17:31
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Zaid
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Autonomic is on a distinguished road
It's been a while but I believe I solved it by applying a sweep mesh as well as face sizing with an appropriate element size. In this case of it was 50 micro meters.
Autonomic is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 8, 2016, 01:08
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Joyce
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9
Joyce is on a distinguished road
Hi, thanks for response.
I used the sweep method in ANSYS Meshing, and I can get the mesh like this:

Now I want to reduce the element number, that I increase the element size along the length direction, but the element quality reduced and it becomes too low to use.

So do you know how to deal with it? or should I change to use other meshing software like ICEM?
Thank you.
Joyce is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 8, 2016, 11:16
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Sarang Dalne
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 15
sarangdalne is on a distinguished road
Define a sweep method on that body keep your element size as before (where you were getting a good mesh) and increase the number of sweep divisions to what you want. This will help your mesh quality.
sarangdalne is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 8, 2016, 11:42
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 18
Antanas is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joyce View Post
Hi, thanks for response.
I used the sweep method in ANSYS Meshing, and I can get the mesh like this:

Now I want to reduce the element number, that I increase the element size along the length direction, but the element quality reduced and it becomes too low to use.

So do you know how to deal with it? or should I change to use other meshing software like ICEM?
Thank you.
What quality metric are you talking about?
Antanas is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 8, 2016, 19:43
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Joyce
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9
Joyce is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Antanas View Post
What quality metric are you talking about?
I used the 'element quality'.
Joyce is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 8, 2016, 23:30
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 18
Antanas is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joyce View Post
I used the 'element quality'.
Not relevant for CFD. You should check Aspect Ratio, Skewness, Ortho. Quality.
oozcan and Joyce like this.
Antanas is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 28, 2017, 18:48
Default
  #10
New Member
 
Joyce
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9
Joyce is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Antanas View Post
Not relevant for CFD. You should check Aspect Ratio, Skewness, Ortho. Quality.
Thank you for your reply!
Joyce is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ANSYS Meshing] long pipe mesh trinitron ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 13 November 4, 2014 16:45
Convergence problems for long narrow channel segersson OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 May 7, 2007 07:06
long narrow faces Jurek FLUENT 1 February 2, 2000 22:20


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:16.