Water Turbine meshed in TurboGrid: Geometry and Topology issues
3 Attachment(s)
Hi all,
Please I have a couple of question regarding my geometry and topology. Geometry: I am simulating a water turbine operating in a river. The turbine has 3 untwisted blades with constant cross-section. The turbine geometry was created using matlab and solidworks. the blade sections was 2D expect the lower one which is attached to the hub. An extra foil was created and attached to the shroud to help trace the shroud curve.
(http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/cfx/22798-can-i-use-turbogrid-mesh-wind-turbine-blade.html) please my last question is can I incorporate another domain with the domain created in TurboGrid e.g. can I surround the turbine passage with cylindrical domain after I import it to ICEM or any other meshing software this to simulate the real water altitude above the water turbine. Also can I extend the rotor passage length; in other words, make the outlet farther downstream to be attached to the outer cylinder. I appreciate you suggestions Thank you, Aziz |
error solved if blade number increased
The error message and the topology mesh shift disappeared are caused when I set One-to-One Interface Ranges> Periodic to anything rather than Full. I am still looking for answers regarding the last two question.
Please any ideas are appreciated thank you |
Quote:
Quote:
|
[QUOTE] ''Do not attach the curved profile at shroud. Just extrude geometry at hub and shroud linearly.''
Thank you Far for your reply. I extracted linear 3D data for both the hub and shroud. No foil was considered at the shroud, but I still have the same curve blade tip. thank you though for the suggestion |
is it possible to show some images at the blade tip with and without shroud? Please make the shroud transparent and turn on the lines as well...
|
2 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE]''is it possible to show some images at the blade tip with and without shroud? Please make the shroud transparent and turn on the lines as well.''
Hi Far Please see attached Thank you |
geometry seems ok to me
|
Hi Far I have more couple of questions can I contact you on your email
Thank you, |
2 Attachment(s)
Hi all I still have problem with the topology mesh.
I used the Traditional Topology method and the topology mesh seems deflected and overlapped at some positions as you can see in the images. This probably because of the small number of blade which caused increase in the passage width . I tried to use control points to fix that but The best I could get is in the images. Please any suggestion are highly appreciated :confused: |
I do not know why the control points cannot be created exactly where I place the cursor. For example, if I tried to position the cursor at a node to fix the distortion it would usually jump either to the upper or lower areas.:mad:
|
:(I have waist a lot of time I think I will go back and use ICEM.
|
even your problem is not solved using ATM topology?
|
No the ATM give you a small errors percent but it yielded a negative volume when generating the mesh.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06. |