CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ICEM] first cell height for laminar flow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By tesorieri

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 8, 2015, 05:07
Default first cell height for laminar flow
  #1
GrN
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 12
GrN is on a distinguished road
Hey everybody,

I'm wondering how to determine the first cell height for laminar flow.

For turbulence the case is quite clear to me, calculating around the y+ value and so on but when it comes down to laminar flow I never found a solid guidance on how to determine the first cell height next to the wall.

I'm feeling kinda dumb as it seems to be rather simple and I'm just missing some obvious stuff. Maybe someone in here might wants to shed some light into this darkness?

Thanks in advance!
GrN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 21, 2015, 13:12
Default
  #2
New Member
 
hernan
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 13
tesorieri is on a distinguished road
In this post by andy_ you'll find the information you need.
Hope it helps!

The modelling assumptions used with turbulence models usually require the first cell to be placed around a particular y+ location. For some it is deep within the laminar sublayer where the turbulent stresses are insignificant (y+ < 1) for others it is in the equilibrium layer (y+ ~ 30) where the assumption that turbulent energy production balances turbulent energy destruction and the transport terms are negligible.

Laminar flows have no turbulence models and hence have none of these constraints on y+ for the first cell. What is required for the first cell and every other cell in the grid is that the gradients in the flow are adequately resolved. This is a function of the discretisation scheme and how well the gradients need to be resolved at the cell location. For example, a fully developed flow in a pipe may require only 1 cell to be fully resolved with a higher order numerical scheme or tens of cells for a low order scheme.

A resolution criteria based on y+ is going to be rather limited in applicability compared to a normal one based on gradients of the solution variables.
sfernaferna and aero_head like this.
tesorieri is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ANSYS Meshing] error updating cell mesh in System Fluid Flow Ema40 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 3 December 9, 2014 02:49
Not Converging, reverse flow, roughness height, ABL Rukiye FLUENT 0 October 7, 2014 05:53
first cell height of a mesh Tensian Main CFD Forum 0 February 20, 2014 12:48
Can 'shock waves' occur in viscous fluid flows? diaw Main CFD Forum 104 February 16, 2006 05:44
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History Abhi Main CFD Forum 12 July 8, 2002 09:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:41.