|
[Sponsors] |
[GAMBIT] Subtracting valume problem/ACIS error 8030 |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 17, 2015, 14:47 |
Subtracting valume problem/ACIS error 8030
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi,
I designed the following turbine model and also, Model attached in following link. http://www.4shared.com/file/gQXfTcPxba/Subtract.html Why not subtract the volume 2 of volume 1? I have this message: ERROR: ACIS error 8030 : inconsistent face-body relationships Restoring the geometric model to the state before the current operation (if there is a positive number of default UNDO levels). Thanks Best, Amir |
|
May 18, 2015, 04:13 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
No one help?
|
|
May 18, 2015, 06:26 |
|
#3 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
cannot download your file from the office
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
May 18, 2015, 06:58 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
........
...... |
|
May 18, 2015, 07:09 |
|
#5 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
nope
try to zip it, and attach it directly in your post (with attachment option)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
May 18, 2015, 07:25 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi,
................. |
|
May 18, 2015, 07:39 |
|
#7 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
you cannot substract volume 2 from volume 1 since volume 2 isn't fully included in volume 1
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
May 18, 2015, 08:17 |
|
#8 | |
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
But I think that volume 2 is within volume 1, I designed this model in Solidwork and It imported in Gambit. Can you tell why volume 2 isn't fully included in volume 1? While, Volume 2 is within the volume1. According to the following figure, Volume2 is fully within volume 1. Therefore, It could be subtract volume2 of volume1. I am grateful that guide me more. |
||
May 18, 2015, 08:43 |
|
#9 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
yes you're right, I checked to quickly ; sorry
So in your case, you need to do following: * copy face.10 with (0 0 10) * copy face.7 with (0 0 -10) * delete volume.2 (enable lower geometry option) * join both trailing edge with an edge * join both leading edge with an edge * create extrado surface from curve * create intrado surface from curve * create new airfoil volume with 4 surfaces * split volume 1 with this new volume *delete both volume outside from your volume 1, and the airfoil That's it Untitled.png
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
May 18, 2015, 10:18 |
|
#10 |
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
Thanks,
I didnt designed this model according to your way and also, I dont want to create any new airfoil. In fact, I used Naca 0020 profile for this design. Up surface of blade and down surface of blade are Naca0020 profile. I want to subtract this model that attached,But How? What is the problem? when volume 2 is within the volume 1, So It should be subtract volume 2 of volume 1. But why not be? Can you subtract this model that I attached? Best. Amir |
|
May 18, 2015, 13:57 |
|
#11 |
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi max
You said about extrado and intrado surface in post#9. What does your mean? I am grateful that answer this question and before questions. Thanks. Best. Amir |
|
May 19, 2015, 00:49 |
|
#12 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
I think it is a tolerance issue, since your faces 10 and 7 are close from surface 5 and 6.
For instance if you enforce the manual tolerance in the substrac tool (1e-3) it will work. For intrados and extrados, I meant lower and upper surface of airfoil (I thought those terms were also english)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
May 19, 2015, 05:35 |
|
#13 |
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
Thanks max
Does this issue make a lot of error of computational? |
|
May 19, 2015, 06:10 |
|
#14 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
no this is just a geometric tolerance
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Other] engineFoam new mesh problem | ayhan515 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 5 | August 10, 2015 08:45 |
UDF compiling problem | Wouter | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 6 | June 6, 2012 04:43 |
Gambit - meshing over airfoil wrapping (?) problem | JFDC | FLUENT | 1 | July 11, 2011 05:59 |
natural convection problem for a CHT problem | Se-Hee | CFX | 2 | June 10, 2007 06:29 |
Adiabatic and Rotating wall (Convection problem) | ParodDav | CFX | 5 | April 29, 2007 19:13 |