CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ICEM] Faulty surface interpretation (unsolved)

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 1, 2015, 10:13
Default Faulty surface interpretation (unsolved)
  #1
New Member
 
Dave M.
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Koblenz, Germany
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 11
Dave_88 is on a distinguished road
Hello everybody,

I have a problem, I hope you might have some useful hints for me.
  • Aim:
    I want to simulate a certain Venturi nozzle with several inlets and a body in the center, in order to improve velocity and turbulence effects. The used fluids are going to be different gases. (For example like a Venturi gasmixer) - the geometry can be seen in P2 (see attachment) where the total model has been cut in order to make use of the rotational symmetry.
  • Procedure:
    After creating a surface body in the CAD program and exporting as Parasolid, I want to read the .x_t-file in ICEM and mesh the geometry.
  • Failure/Problem:
    When importing the file to ICEM, I have faulty surfaces, which do not fit the curves. To show this, please see P1 of the attached images. In order to get rid of the "extra surface" I tried to delete the faulty surface, and instead to create a simple surface with multiple curves (P3). The results where also not very satisfying - the created surface was created on the outside instead of filling the inside. I also receive the message "cannot create a nice fill".
Since I do not have very much experience with these faulty surfaces in ICEM, I have no more ideas, how to fix this. Thus I would really appreciate any kind of hints, that could make me repair the model. The created mesh, of course, is also broken and is not usable for further investigations.



Thank you in advance for your help - I hope anybody has had this kind of failure before (which I suggest) and has some solution.


Best regards,
Dave
Attached Images
File Type: png P1.PNG (33.7 KB, 18 views)
File Type: png P2.PNG (11.5 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg P3.jpg (58.1 KB, 15 views)
Dave_88 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 24, 2018, 13:37
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Maharashtra
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 8
Sachin Zanje is on a distinguished road
Facing the same issue.
Sachin Zanje is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 24, 2018, 18:18
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,827
Rep Power: 27
Gert-Jan will become famous soon enough
- Set Topology and triangulation tolerances tighter.
- Don't be mislead by the spiky edges and surfaces. This can be a matter of visualisation. Use your RMB on surfaces and select "Full" to get a tighter representation.
- If you create a surface from 4 edges, you must be sure these form a closed loop. If not, then you will find a large surface, as given in the figure by Dave M.
Gert-Jan is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Gmsh] Error : Self intersecting surface mesh, computing intersections & Error : Impossible velan OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 3 October 22, 2015 11:05
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh no layers and no decent mesh for complex geometry pizzaspinate OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 1 February 25, 2015 07:05
solid edge problem....can you help? cindy Main CFD Forum 3 April 5, 2004 13:43
Patran Volume Meshing Deb CFX 19 April 17, 2003 10:56
free convection heat transfer from a heated horizontal surface through a liquid to a thin cooled fin Kaushik FLUENT 1 May 8, 2000 06:47


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27.