CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ICEM] Delauney Mesh from Octree Mesh- Can we bypass?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 13, 2017, 22:30
Default Delauney Mesh from Octree Mesh- Can we bypass?
  #1
Member
 
Vish
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Purdue University, IN, USA.
Posts: 59
Rep Power: 13
anand32 will become famous soon enough
Dear All

I am currently learning CFD meshing primarily through ICEM and am now on tet meshes.

My question to you is regarding generating Delauney mesh.

We all know that Delauney mesh requires a surface mesh. Generally, we use Octree mesh first, delete the volume mesh and then create the Delauney mesh from the remaining (surface) elements- perhaps after smoothening.

However, we know that Octree mesh needs a closed geometry- no yellow curves.

So can we avoid Octree mesh altogether by creating a shell mesh first, and then launching Delauney? Will this strategy work in the case of yellow curves- where Octree will fail?

Thank you.

Last edited by anand32; March 13, 2017 at 22:31. Reason: Did not want to show my true name
anand32 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 13, 2017, 23:40
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
diamondx's Avatar
 
Ghazlani M. Ali
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 1,385
Blog Entries: 23
Rep Power: 28
diamondx will become famous soon enough
Yellow curve means there is no cap. So mesh will propagate. Your intentions are not clear. Yes you can create shell and then delaunay, this approach does not always work, it depends on the complexity of the geometry and sizing ( uniform sizing). Can you share some picture to show us your intentions. You know you can create a solid body then delete the volume mesh. You will end up with surface mesh only...
__________________
Regards,
New to ICEM CFD, try this document --> https://goo.gl/KAOIwm
Ali
diamondx is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 14, 2017, 06:07
Default
  #3
kad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 200
Rep Power: 24
kad will become famous soon enoughkad will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by anand32 View Post

So can we avoid Octree mesh altogether by creating a shell mesh first, and then launching Delauney? Will this strategy work in the case of yellow curves- where Octree will fail?

Thank you.
Like diamondx stated in general yes. Shell mesh can be created first. On the other hand this strategy is very unlikely to work as long as there yellow or single curves for patch dependent meshing. Topolgy and sizing is much more critical for patch dependent algorithm.

Another point: As we do not know your model single curves might also be legit in some rare cases. Imagine a 2D baffle surface e.g.
kad is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[snappyHexMesh] Snappyhex mesh: poor inlet mesh Swagga5aur OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 1 December 3, 2016 16:59
Star CCM Overset Mesh Error (Rotating Turbine) thezack Siemens 7 October 12, 2016 11:14
[ICEM] Delauney volume mesh going wrong Rohith Giridhar ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 1 July 26, 2015 19:53
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh no layers and no decent mesh for complex geometry pizzaspinate OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 1 February 25, 2015 07:05
[snappyHexMesh] Layers:problem with curvature giulio.topazio OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 10 August 22, 2012 09:03


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:26.