CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

ICEM Prism Layer transition between surface with prism layers and one without

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 25, 2009, 15:20
Default ICEM Prism Layer transition between surface with prism layers and one without
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 17
TWaung is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I'm hoping someone could suggest a prism layer strategy for the following problem. I am generating an unstructured tetrahedral mesh in ANSYS ICEM 11.0.

I am modeling a 3D air intake geometry. My domain extends downstream of the true outflow plane of the intake geometry because I expect limited regions of flow separation at the outflow plane.

Upstream of the outflow plane the domain surfaces are defined as no-slip walls, and downstream of the outflow plane I have defined the surfaces to be slip walls.

I want the prism layer along the intake walls to extend all the way to the outflow plane. In order to do this, I have had to let the prism layer extend onto the slip wall surfaces.

I am finding that my residuals (P-Mass, u,v,w momentum) are very high in the regions where there are prism layers along slip walls.

I would like to not use prism layers along slip walls but still have prism layers along the no-slip walls right up to the outflow plane.

Is this possible? Does anyone have suggestions on how this could be done?

Thanks!

Tim
TWaung is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 12, 2009, 14:54
Wink ...Not very timely, but better late than never?
  #2
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
If you just stop the prism at the internal outflow boundary, the pyramids and tetras attached would likely be very poor quality. I recomend putting a much taller initial height in the slip area so the prism can transition to a more reasonable aspect ratio before you delete them and then fill the region with bottom up tetra... Actually, if you increase the height on these prisms, you may not have the problem with your solver...

Another option would be to break the slip section into two regions. Use the upstream region, adjacent to the viscous flow domain to increase the height of the prisms. Then set no prisms on the lower section. You will see the prisms start to swell and then pyramid caps will form to stair step the prisms away.

Simon
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 12, 2009, 14:56
Default In case I didn't explain enough...
  #3
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
I just noticed I didn't explain the problem... If your boundary layer has very thin prisms along the wall, these will not cap well because the pyramids and tetras would have to be very high aspect ratio, which would translate to poor internal angles, high skewness, etc.

Thickening the layer in the transition regions reduces these problems.
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:15.