|
[Sponsors] |
January 14, 2010, 09:09 |
2D gambit and fluent
|
#1 |
New Member
Chih Fang
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello.. I need help here.. Im doing a project which requires me to do turbulence modelling for an airfoil. Im a beginner in this field, just learn gambit and fluent.
As my 1st task, i was ask by my supervisor to compare the best mesh for my airfoil. Use fluent to get the Cl vs alpha and also the required contours. However, after running analysis using fluent for 3 different meshes, i realize that my data is very different from experimental data which i obtained from internet. Im doing Naca 0012, so from internet, the stall angle for 2x10^6 is around 10-15 deg. However, for my mesh, i run the analysis until 25 deg, but the Cl is still not decreasing. Can anyone help me and tell me what is wrong with my mesh? Thanx alot.. |
|
January 16, 2010, 14:55 |
|
#2 |
New Member
USMAN
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 16 |
hi ,,
you have not mentioned your mesh size and type of mesh.Anyhow your problem is simple and the reason for not stalling the airfoil is not dependent upon mesh.you should make sure that your airfoil vortex data was correct in Gambit and proper domain and boundary conditions were given in Fluent.I will suggest a circular domain with "pressure far field" boundary condition. |
|
January 17, 2010, 22:20 |
Will try..
|
#3 |
New Member
Chih Fang
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 16 |
hi ,,
you have not mentioned your mesh size and type of mesh.Anyhow your problem is simple and the reason for not stalling the airfoil is not dependent upon mesh.you should make sure that your airfoil vortex data was correct in Gambit and proper domain and boundary conditions were given in Fluent.I will suggest a circular domain with "pressure far field" boundary condition. Thanks for the comment.. Well, im trying with 3 different meshes, structured, unstructured and also with boundary layer.. I also tried coarse, medium and fine for all the meshes. But for my boundary layer, when i reach 10 deg, my fluent data is not converge, but fluent gives me a repetitive 'mountain shape data. /\../\ something like i show here.. i am using a circular arc to put my airfoil and a rectangular at the back of airfoil.. then boundary condition i used for the arc is velocity inlet. perhaps i will try pressure far field and see whether i get the correct result or not.. Thanks again.. |
|
January 18, 2010, 03:28 |
no problem..
|
#4 |
New Member
USMAN
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 16 |
no need to say thanks,,,
wish you all the best for your project ! by the way you even dont need boundary profile at this stage,,, simply make an airfoil with circular domain,and tri paved mesh,, you will find good results.. increase the difficulty gradually... good luck |
|
January 18, 2010, 03:54 |
Trouble..
|
#5 |
New Member
Chih Fang
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 16 |
Im trying to use pressure far field at the arc of my mesh (means the front part, however i still cant get the desired values.. i get a very high value for my cl. I got 4.2 for my angle of attack 5 deg. last time, i used velocity inlet at the arc. Im not that familiar with fluent, but time is kinda limited for me to explore everything.
|
|
January 18, 2010, 04:02 |
haha..
|
#6 |
New Member
Chih Fang
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 16 |
I set the wrong gauge pressure... hahaha..
|
|
January 18, 2010, 05:14 |
Still cant..
|
#7 |
New Member
Chih Fang
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 16 |
I still cant get the satisfying results although i used pressure far field.. i dont know wats wrong..
|
|
June 20, 2017, 06:09 |
Problem in 2D mesh !
|
#8 |
Member
|
Dear Experts,
While making 2D mesh, how to make an inner zone ? Actually, 5*5 cm box filled with water. Air injection is from bottom INLET 0.1 cm. There is an inner zone that occupies the inlet and the path of bubbly flow. However, bubbles can pass through this zone because this zone is made just for focusing main area.* Although, it is looking very simple but problem arises when this inner zone should be shown in boundary condition window. ( See Fig. 1) I made this inner zone, called it INTERIOR and obtained in BC. Because of this inappropriate zone the results are not as actual as it should be. ( see Fig. 2 , 2b). Actual results are shown in Fig. 3. Any guideline, advise will be highly appreciated. I would be more thankful *If there is guideline by using Gambit software.. Thanks in Advance M. F. Ali Problem in 2D mesh !. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Problem_in_2D_mesh [accessed Jun 20, 2017]. |
|
June 22, 2017, 03:19 |
|
#9 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
In Gambit you only have to split your domain.
You don't have to set anything with interior. If your splits are well done, gambit will automatically set the zones as fluid. Then in Gambit you have to differentiate your fluid domains for being able to patch them separately for any BC. Check Specify Continuum Types: https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Gam...zone_cont_type
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Importing Gambit data into Fluent | Tyred | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | April 18, 2009 14:53 |
SketchUp 3D model import to Gambit or Fluent | Steve Johnson | FLUENT | 0 | February 8, 2009 15:21 |
Facing Few Problems in Fluent and Gambit | Ravi Duggirala | FLUENT | 5 | March 11, 2006 04:13 |
test cases for Fluent and Gambit | Ben | FLUENT | 1 | May 21, 2003 07:44 |
2D geometry Gambit 2.0.6 to Fluent 6 | Bo Jensen | FLUENT | 1 | January 17, 2003 10:55 |