CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

CFD versus Structural Meshing

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 21, 2010, 16:40
Default CFD versus Structural Meshing
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 145
Rep Power: 11
Jade M is on a distinguished road
Why does it take only a few minutes to mesh for a structural mesh and from several minutes up to hours to mesh for CFD? It seems that ANSYS uses the same meshing program regardless of the type of analysis?

Thank you for any help!
Jade M is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 8, 2010, 20:04
Default Physics based defaults.
Retired from CFD Online
PSYMN's Avatar
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,665
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 39
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
Is this because the CFD mesh has a lot more elements?

In ANSYS Meshing, you tell it the physics (CFD, EMAG, FEA, Explicit) and it sets up your defaults to give a reasonable mesh. For instance, if you said FEA, it would know that you need a coarse mesh, probably quadratic Tets or Swept Hexa. If you chose EMAG, the tetras would have mid nodes, but would still be linear. If you chose CFD and you had "Program controlled inflation" on, it would know to give you a much finer mesh with linear tets or hexas, a sizing function to keep several cells across any gap and inflation (prisms or hexas) along walls (but not along Inlet, outlet or symmetry planes). In fact, it is smart enough to mesh differently if you tell it CFD-Fluent vs CFD-CFX, based on the specific needs of each solver.

On a given model, the FEA default mesh could be only a few thousand elements, where as the mesher would insert millions of cells to resolve the same volume for CFD. Those extra elements with higher quality requirements take more time.

Best regards,

PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFD Design...The CFD Future John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 20 November 20, 2015 00:40
which software CFD is suitable for Civil & Structural Engineer deust Main CFD Forum 1 February 27, 2010 08:20
Tetrahedral vs. Hexahedral Meshing for CFD Andy Bartels Main CFD Forum 14 August 22, 2000 07:35
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 Chris R. Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 August 21, 2000 04:49
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. Tareq Al-shaalan Main CFD Forum 10 June 12, 1999 23:27

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:21.