CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[GAMBIT] Pave + Hard edges

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 10, 2011, 13:16
Default Pave + Hard edges
  #1
Member
 
kostas
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 15
pankos is on a distinguished road
I use Gambit software.
If i want to have more dense mesh (in pave method at 2d-face) at a region in one domain, i must make "hard edges" at this region. Right? After Can i delete all hard edges and to remain the face and its mesh?

With word "hard edges", we mean the split of face by an edge? This is Right?
pankos is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 11, 2011, 01:18
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
an hard edge is an edge which splits partially a surface.
That means it doesn't divide you surface into 2 separated surfaces and it can give you meshing trouble.
Sans titre.png
If you want to refine your surface (homogeneous), you can decrease the value of element size in the meshing panel.
Or you can use split and size fonctions combination.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 12, 2011, 21:47
Default
  #3
Member
 
Santiago
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 16
gascortado is on a distinguished road
Regarding hard edges. I'm trying to model a a plate inside a turbulent BL using LES and Gambit. Take a look at the attahced mesh. The simulation gets screwed up at the intersection of the structured and unstructered mesh. There are artificial eddies formed and the flow gets disturbed. Is there any way to solve this type of problem? I tried using Hex elements only, but my plate in a void inside the middle volume and I'm forced to use tet elements. Any sugestions?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Untitled.jpg (64.8 KB, 15 views)
gascortado is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2011, 01:00
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
I don't understand why you can't use hexa instead of tetra.
Can you post a picture of your result at the intersection between structured and unstructured mesh.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 17, 2011, 19:32
Default
  #5
Member
 
Santiago
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 16
gascortado is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your reply Max and sorry for my late answer. take a look at the picture. I'm basically exporting my mesh to OpenFoam. LEt em know what you think. Thanks
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Screenshot1.jpg (35.0 KB, 13 views)
gascortado is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 18, 2011, 01:19
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
Regarding your picture your are working with unsteady solver, right?
Did you try to run your model with steady solver?
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 18, 2011, 07:00
Default
  #7
Member
 
Santiago
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 16
gascortado is on a distinguished road
yes im using an unsteady solver because this is an LES simulation. Would a steady solver work in conbination with LES?
gascortado is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 18, 2011, 07:04
Default
  #8
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
Indepedantly from your physics, you may switch to steady solver and standard turbulent model, just for be sure that your problem comes from your mesh (or not).
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow vishwa OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 24 June 27, 2016 08:54
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh aborting Tobi OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 0 November 10, 2010 03:23
[GAMBIT] Split edges? Zweeper ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 14 February 25, 2010 14:28
[snappyHexMesh] external flow with snappyHexMesh chelvistero OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 11 January 15, 2010 19:43
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 11:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40.