|
[Sponsors] |
[ANSYS Meshing] Help needed in meshing multi-stage turbine using Workbench |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 21, 2012, 06:56 |
Help needed in meshing multi-stage turbine using Workbench
|
#1 |
Senior Member
KGN
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi all,
I want to simulate a 5-stage gas turbine. The geomerty details are a follows,
Thanks KGN |
|
February 21, 2012, 10:22 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
|
General guide lines for simulation:
1.Either use ICEM CFD or Turbogrid (TG is recommended for its easiness) for meshing. 2.To setup case in workbench, you need to select the CFX (Or Fluent, CFX is recommended) and then input the mesh. To create the interfaces, you just need to select the corresponding inlet/outlet faces and you are done. 3.Mixing plane is available there, as well as new transient model which requires few passages. 4. You just need to model only one passage (with periodic boundaries) in ICEM/Turbogrid and you have option in CFX-Pre to select more than one passages. Mesh for other passages shall be created by CFX pre for you. 5. SST model is recommended 6. Boundary conditions >>>>>> What information is available with you? 7. Temperature dependent properties may be required to accurately model the enthalpy/temprature change from stage to stage (error is significant for 5-stage turbine) What type of help is required in meshing? First decide you want to use ICEM or Turbogrid, because for both software route is different. ICEM requires more efforts and is useful if TG templates are not supporting geometry features you have. |
|
February 22, 2012, 00:02 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
KGN
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi Far,
Thanks for the reply. I will be using Workbench for meshing and fluent for simulation. I yet to get the boundary condition, and will update once i get. I need some more details on periodic boundary condition, like deciding the number of passages for my case. stage 1 -> stator-4 blades, rotor-9 blades stage 3-5 -> stator-7 blades, rotor-9 blades Thanks KGN |
|
February 22, 2012, 03:53 |
|
#4 | |||
Super Moderator
|
Quote:
Quote:
For sliding mesh you need more passages to match the pitch of upstream and downstream components. If you decide to go for frozen rotor simulation then you shall get the solution more accurate to mixing plane model but shall be only valid to that relative position of upstream and downstream blade row. You can think of frozen rotor simulation as equivalent to sliding mesh results at some instant. There is another model (I guess phase shift model) in CFX. http://www.ansys.com/Products/ANSYS+...ase+Highlights. Quoting some lines here: Quote:
http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/blo...machinery.html |
||||
February 22, 2012, 04:17 |
|
#5 | ||
Senior Member
KGN
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 16 |
For meshing i ll be using Ansys workbench meshing tool, not the turbogrid.
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks KGN |
|||
February 22, 2012, 06:24 |
|
#6 | |||
Super Moderator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
February 22, 2012, 07:01 |
|
#7 | ||
Senior Member
KGN
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
February 23, 2012, 15:51 |
|
#8 | |
Super Moderator
|
Quote:
Any further update? |
||
February 23, 2012, 23:59 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
KGN
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 16 |
Thanks for the clarification. I am still waiting for the inputs, i ll update u once i get it.
Thanks KGN |
|
February 24, 2012, 01:10 |
|
#10 | |
Super Moderator
|
Quote:
|
||
February 24, 2012, 03:57 |
|
#11 |
Senior Member
KGN
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 16 |
||
February 27, 2012, 01:24 |
|
#13 |
Senior Member
KGN
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 16 |
i have the CAD geometry, i am trying to extract the fluid volume, then i ll start meshing.
|
|
February 27, 2012, 03:43 |
|
#14 |
Senior Member
KGN
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi Far,
While cleaning up the geometry for extracting the fluid volume, i noticed a clearnace between the rotor blade tip and the housing. Plz c the attached picture for better understanding. So my question is, while specfying the rotating region (rotor blade+fluid) whether we ve to include that in the fluid region or we ve separate it and specify it as stationary region. Sorry i cant include the actual geometry because of NDA (Non-Diclosure aggrement) Also can u tell what is the best strategy to extract the fluid volume Regards KGN |
|
February 27, 2012, 05:56 |
|
#15 |
Super Moderator
|
It is included.
So you have three walls : hub, blade and casing. In blade there is also wall parallel to casing that is top of blade (no wall if no tip clearance). Also you have one fluid region that includes the fluid in blade region as well as in tip region. Separate fluid regions are necessary when you are studying some stall concepts in compressor or tip recess in turbine. If needed I can provide you details how to do this. To specify which is rotating or not rotating is done in CFX Pre. Meshing should be done in Turbogrid for each component. You should include the axial extent up to mid way between two components in .curve files. Generally we give these boundary conditions 1. Fluid rotating. 2. hub is fixed relative to fluid (so in inertial frame it is moving, but in rotating frame is stationary). So you will not specify no motion condition for hub. 3. Blade: Same as hub 4. Casing : counter rotating wall. It is stationary in inertial reference frame but rotating in rotating reference frame, but in opposite direction. 5. Inlet: Total pressure, velocity components (normally axial =1, radial = 0 and tangential = 0 for axial inflow) 6. Outlet : static pressure. |
|
February 27, 2012, 06:43 |
|
#16 | ||
Senior Member
KGN
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
Quote:
Also if u can provide me some link to multi-stage turbine both tutorial and journal paper, It will be more helpful. Thanks KGN |
|||
February 27, 2012, 07:53 |
|
#17 |
Super Moderator
|
Here are some clarifications:
Actually we shall use the rotating reference frame for rotor. So instead of inertial or stationary reference frame, we are now with moving reference frame. In this reference frame (rotation speed equal to rotor and hub speed), hub and blade (we will specify them as no slip walls) are stationary and on the other hand casing is moving in opposite direction with equal speed (counter rotating wall in CFX pre). There is no difference in handling the meshing part for single blade row, stage or multistage. There is additional specification of interface plane related to solver where we specify it as mixing plane, frozen rotor or sliding mesh depending on the requirements. PS : We should discuss this on CFX or Fluent forum (according to forum policy we can only discuss meshing and geometry ) |
|
February 28, 2012, 00:32 |
|
#18 |
Senior Member
KGN
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 16 |
I am cleaning up the geometry for extracting the fluid volume. I have the solidwork model, so whats the best strategy to extract the fluid volume.
(or), we can just import the model into the workbench and then mesh the surface and fluid volume. |
|
February 29, 2012, 09:20 |
|
#19 |
Super Moderator
|
You should only keep the hub surface, blade and casing surface. Delete all unnecessary details related to manufacturing like bolts, shaft etc.
If you can post pic, then I can tell you exactly what to keep and what to delete!!! |
|
March 1, 2012, 00:04 |
|
#20 |
Senior Member
KGN
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 16 |
Sorry I cant post the geometry, bcz of NDA(Non-disclosure aggreement)
I cleaned the geometry, now i have only hub, blade and casing. As i mentioned earlier there is a tip clearance between rotor blade and casing, also between stator blade and casing. I want to the study the effect of tip clearance, So could you please explain how to mesh. I am going to use Ansys Workbench for meshing, so whether i can directly export the geometry to the workbench or extract the fluid volume and then export only the fluid volume for meshing. Which is the best strategy? Regards KGN |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFD analysis on wind turbine rotor | Ken (Wind Turbine CFD Super Rookie) | Main CFD Forum | 45 | February 9, 2016 14:07 |
Meshing Volume in Gambit for a water turbine | Zaqie | FLUENT | 1 | July 24, 2009 01:25 |
Marine current turbine (meshing and stimulation help needed!!) | coolyihao | FLOW-3D | 0 | March 16, 2009 11:48 |
Q: how to do a good meshing in turbine usin gambit | oscar | FLOW-3D | 1 | March 14, 2009 23:15 |
Meshing locks workbench window. | andy2o | CFX | 0 | February 1, 2008 05:01 |