CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS

Two way FSI time stepping for different time scales

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By QBeast

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 6, 2016, 11:35
Default Two way FSI time stepping for different time scales
  #1
New Member
 
Sad Debbahi
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 13
QBeast is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to QBeast
Dear forum users,

I'm running a 2-way FSI problem, transient structural(Anays mechanical)-fluidflow(fluent)

Problem description:

In a 2-way FSI problem, I have been struggling with the possibility of resolving the two systems fluid & structural on two different timscales, I'm doing a vertically standing rubber plate subjected to pressure build up on its face due to incoming fluid (air with single longitudinal velocity component at 4 m/s), the model is all set and start iterating, but the fluid flow evolves on relatively smaller time scales and needs say ~ a 5e-4 sec timestep to converge properly, while I managed to solve the transient structural analysis (alone) on a much larger timescale, like 0.05 sec and then 0.1s timestep. Now the problem comes mainly from the analysis settings of the coupling service which overrides the time stepping for Ansys Mechanical and fluent.

Question:

I am wondering if there is a way to avoid solving the structural problem for every fluid flow timestep which is too small for the rubber plate problem, and requiring a lot of CPU time to inverse the matrix by the Transient Structural solver?
.
My physical view of this coupled problem is that the flow field features developed around the obstacle (rubber plate) would include flow structures evolving on a finer timescale compared to the change of the force acting on the rubber plate, so in my opinion one need not necessarily to solve transient structural on the very same tiny timescale as the fluid system.
Ideally, I would’ve used (if possible) a fine time step for CFD say 5e-4 sec to ensure convergence of the turbulent flow and a suitable one for structural 0.05 sec, which is 100 time ratio and avoids inverting the matrix for the structural (100 times), since the load (aerodynamic force acting on the plate) doesn’t change that fast, at least as an integral value over the face.
Thanks in advance, I would appreciate comments or suggestion on this issue.
Best regards

mortazavi likes this.

Last edited by QBeast; August 11, 2016 at 08:58.
QBeast is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 10, 2016, 16:09
Default
  #2
Member
 
SMN
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CANADA
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 14
mortazavi is on a distinguished road
Hi, I think this is not possible in 2way fsi. the simulation iterates in each time step for both solid and fluid domains.
mortazavi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 11, 2016, 06:58
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Sad Debbahi
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 13
QBeast is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to QBeast
Thanks mortazavi, that's what I was afraid of, unfortunately this makes the coupled problem too computationally expensive on the structural side.
I'm wodering if there is a scripting I can hook in the mechanical model to workaround the this limitation ? otherwise Ansys should be thinking of this separate timescales issue, since it appears as a serious limitation.

Regards.
QBeast is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
2 way fsi, ansys coupling, fluid structure interface, fsi, time stepping

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
simpleFoam error - "Floating point exception" mbcx4jc2 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 12 August 4, 2015 02:20
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 06:20
AMI interDyMFoam for mixer nu problem danny123 OpenFOAM Programming & Development 8 September 6, 2013 02:34
CFL in dual time stepping with implicit scheme dokeun Main CFD Forum 0 May 8, 2013 23:01
pisoFoam with k-epsilon turb blows up - Some questions Heroic OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 26 December 17, 2012 03:34


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41.