CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS

Y-plus value for turbulent models

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 3, 2021, 15:00
Default Y-plus value for turbulent models
  #1
IBC
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 2
IBC is on a distinguished road
Hello,

What is the recommended y-plus value for the standard k-epsilon model?
IBC is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 4, 2021, 21:51
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
rupak504's Avatar
 
Lolita
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 7
rupak504 is on a distinguished road
Y+ is a non-dimensional distance from the wall to first node of your mesh, which is required by your turbulence model to clearly define the boundary layer region. Having said that, the correct value of Y+ depends on many factors, such as flow behavior, Reynolds number etc...., If you are not sure about the Y+ value, you can start with a safe value i.e. 1, keep in mind that, this affects your computational expense and time, and then if its overkill, you can increase it in your future simulations.
rupak504 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2021, 15:01
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 3
EleGiova is on a distinguished road
Hi, what I understood and studied if you are using k-epsilon models you can either use a Low Reynolds or a High Reynolds approach.


If you are using a Low Reynolds approach that means you are supposed to have a yplus = 1 more or less, so you have to use a two layers treatment of the wall such as Enhanced wall treatment (you find it in the drop down list).

If you are using a High Reynolds approach you must have a 30 < yplus < 500 and can use the wall function as standard, scalable etc.


You can have a look here for this kind of theory: https://www.afs.enea.it/project/nept.../th/node98.htm .

Anyway what I suggest you to do is that of calculate an esteem of the yplus based on your case dimensions (https://www.pointwise.com/yplus/index.html), start from this and do some stationary calculations (like 50 iterations something like this) and plot the yplus (xyplot - turbulence - wall yplus) and see if you are on the range you expected.

Hope this will help,
E.G
EleGiova is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2021, 15:02
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 3
EleGiova is on a distinguished road
Ps. I don't recommend to use standard k-epsilon model, much better RNG or realizable.
EleGiova is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Latest Developed Turbulence Models Tobi OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 15 August 26, 2020 11:40
Worse accuracy in LES models than in RANS models dferrando OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 August 30, 2017 04:56
Eddy Viscosity Models and Reynolds Stress Models JuPa CFX 1 August 20, 2013 18:56
Incompressible Turbulence models achinta OpenFOAM 4 May 27, 2010 10:35
Two-fluid models vs mixture models for bubbly flows Hansong Tang Main CFD Forum 6 December 8, 2009 03:21


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:43.