CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens

How to define blending factor?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By frankie

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 4, 2003, 04:23
Default How to define blending factor?
  #1
Julie Polyakh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

Does anybody know how to define blending factor for discretization schemes?

The case I deal with includes turbulent flow with combustion and conjugate heat transfer.

Regards,

Julie
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 4, 2003, 06:14
Default Re: How to define blending factor?
  #2
frankie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Blending factor is defined as being the amount of higher-differencing scheme (hence MARS,SCFD,CD,etc...) you take relatively to the first-order discretisation scheme (UD). For example, if you have a blending factor of MARS 0.8, the space derivatives are calculated by using a first order scheme weighted by 0.2 and a using the MARS discretisation scheme weighted by a factor of 0.8. In fact, it is a little bit more complicated than that, but if you have some spare time, take a look to the book Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Ferziger & Peric, Springer, 2002. Take a closer look at the section dealing with deferred correction and discretisation of convective fluxes.
chengyu likes this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 4, 2003, 07:46
Default Re: How to define blending factor?
  #3
Ossi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The so called blended differencing schemes are CD, LUD, and QUICK in Star-CD.

MARS is different ! In MARS the blending factor is NOT a factor defining blending between a first order scheme and a second order scheme as it is in the other schemes but it is more a compressibility factor that defines how well it captures sharp discontimuities in the solution. MARS is a TVD-based scheme and many different TVD-schemes can be obtained by only varying how well does it capture discontinuities. Note also that MARS is always formally second order accurate, no matter what is the bf used.

In case you use bf=1.0 for MARS it captures as well as possible discontinuities BUT be aware that it can also lead to unphysical behavior. Without an additional entropy condition (which is most likely not in Star) this can lead to a situation were the solution is actually making sharp discontinuities, e.g. like high velocity or temperature peaks.

My advise is that with MARS use bf=0.5 at the most. This usually gives good solutions. With academic cases you may be able to use bf=1.0 with MARS.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
In Post-First blending function for BSL and SST anna CFX 2 September 24, 2011 18:27
how to define memory allocation factor in unix steven CFX 1 October 25, 2005 10:26
blending volumes mettler FLUENT 0 August 25, 2004 20:58
SST blending function F1 Kriegel FLUENT 0 May 14, 2003 04:34
define my own DEFINE macro? to model pithing naca calogero FLUENT 0 April 10, 2003 05:10


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12.