|
[Sponsors] |
June 14, 2008, 16:56 |
ProEngineer Wildfire to Star-CCM+
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am having a heck of a time exporting geometry from ProE to Star-CCM+ without encountering non-manifold surfaces. The only formats I can get to work are IGES and STEP. I've tried setting the accuracy in ProE to 1.e-06 but I still get surface problems. Do any ProE users have any advice to give?
|
|
June 15, 2008, 04:38 |
Re: ProEngineer Wildfire to Star-CCM+
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Have you tried Parasolid format (file.x_t)?!
|
|
June 15, 2008, 16:27 |
Re: ProEngineer Wildfire to Star-CCM+
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It won't even import the parasolid. It just throws up an error almost immediately. Any more suggestions? ~Thanks
|
|
June 15, 2008, 16:41 |
Re: ProEngineer Wildfire to Star-CCM+
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is import to ccm+ essential? It does not really have a geometry core so far. SO it has to facet gerometry.
|
|
June 15, 2008, 19:00 |
Re: ProEngineer Wildfire to Star-CCM+
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
How can I use Star-CCM+ if I can not import geometry?
|
|
June 16, 2008, 04:27 |
Re: ProEngineer Wildfire to Star-CCM+
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I would recommend update your ccm+ version to 3.02.006 if you haven't done it yet!
I've imported parasolid files many times and it works perfectly fine. This is what I do in Pro/E: File > Save a Copy > then filename.x_t > ok select "Solids" & "Shells" > ok |
|
June 27, 2008, 02:27 |
Re: ProEngineer Wildfire to Star-CCM+
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
i recommend you not to use Pro-E for transformation. Pro-E exports geometries very badly.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PRO/E Wildfire Integration | Matt | FLUENT | 1 | April 10, 2007 01:56 |
ICEMCFD - Proe wildfire 3 direct cad interface? | Phil | CFX | 1 | February 27, 2007 20:31 |
direct import proEngineer | nasser | FLUENT | 4 | June 25, 2006 14:53 |
ProEngineer Access | Donna | CFX | 3 | July 11, 2003 09:36 |