CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > CFD Freelancers

Naca0012 OpenFoam Simulations

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 30, 2018, 09:29
Default Naca0012 OpenFoam Simulations
  #1
Senior Member
 
Lorenzo Galieti
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 373
Rep Power: 12
LoGaL is on a distinguished road
Greetings

I am currently carrying out some simulations of a naca0012 profile at different angles of attack, as preliminary stuff for my semester project. I am creating the naca profile using a matlab script and the usual naca equation, then the mesh with Salome.
I cannot manage to capture the correct lift coefficent for the airfoil: for low angles of attack i would expect it to match closely the theorical values provided by Thin Airfoil Theory, as it happens other simulations/experimental tests (Nasa measurements, Wind Tunnel test ecc)
Turns out that my simulations underestimate the lift coefficent of about 30-40% percent. Say, for example, at 6 AOA, i get about 0.4 with respect to the theorical 0.65.

Due to the small chord (about 0.3 m )of the airfoil we want to use in the wind tunnel with my professor, the simulation type that i am running is laminar.
I am attaching controlDicts, initial conditions ecc ecc (the mesh z direction is 0.03)
I initially used simpleFoam solver, but since residuals didn't get too low on Uy,P i switched to pisoFoam (lately, i've been also initializing it using a potential Flow solution)
I tried with different meshes (all structured, but with different refinements ecc) with no avail. In all cases, the trailing edge was sharp.
From what i can see visualizing the solution, seems like OpenFoam overpredicts Boundary Layer separation, as i already have large bubbles at the already mentioned 6 AOA, which i guess it shouldn't happen. This seems consistent with the underpredicted lift coefficent with respect to the correct one.

I was wondering wether one of you might spot a stupid mistake i made and/or provide tips/suggestions to solve the issue

Thank you very much!
Attached Files
File Type: txt controlDict.txt (1.9 KB, 11 views)
File Type: txt fvSchemes.txt (1.3 KB, 3 views)
File Type: txt fvSolution.txt (1.4 KB, 4 views)
File Type: txt p.txt (1.2 KB, 6 views)
File Type: txt U.txt (1.4 KB, 6 views)
LoGaL is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 3, 2018, 04:02
Default
  #2
Member
 
Sangeet
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: India
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 8
sangeet is on a distinguished road
Hello.
Do you still need help?
sangeet is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 24, 2018, 10:18
Default
  #3
Member
 
Arthur
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Italy
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 11
Artur.Ant is on a distinguished road
Did you solve your case?
Artur.Ant is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 12, 2018, 00:00
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Gokul Ravi
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 8
gokulravi.pgt is on a distinguished road
Do you still need the help to solving it?
gokulravi.pgt is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3D simulations OpenFoam running too low(more 1 000 000 elements) Suggestion speed up? silvai OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 April 6, 2017 11:44
OpenFOAM Training Jan-Jul 2017, Virtual, London, Houston, Berlin CFDFoundation OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources 0 January 4, 2017 06:15
OpenFOAM Training: Programming CFD Course 12-13 and 19-20 April 2016 cfd.direct OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources 0 January 14, 2016 10:19
Optimising the Parallelisation of OpenFOAM Simulations KateEisenhower OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 October 30, 2015 04:43
OpenFOAM good for simulations in sub-mm range? bgoeppner OpenFOAM 1 January 28, 2010 09:22


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:41.