 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
March 6, 2019, 04:28
|
Mesh independence
|
#1 |
|
New Member
crinoid
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 7  |
Hi to everybody,
When checking meshing independence I make 3 meshes with different coarsenings. The viscosity k-omega SST model is used in all of them. My question is the following: should I keep the height of the first cell in contact with walls in the 3 meshes in order to keep the y+, so the viscosity model keeps being valid? Thanks in advance! |
|
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2019, 20:26
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 92
Rep Power: 11 |
If you have control on the first cell distant from the wall, you should keep the same for all 3 meshes level
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13, 2019, 18:08
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
crinoid
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 7 |
Perfect, thanks!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Tags |
| independence, yplus |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Transient mode simulation (VoF model) mesh independence study problem | yulu | FLUENT | 4 | September 20, 2016 17:30 |
| [snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap | bobburnquist | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | August 26, 2015 09:38 |
| [snappyHexMesh] Layers:problem with curvature | giulio.topazio | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 10 | August 22, 2012 09:03 |
| [snappyHexMesh] external flow with snappyHexMesh | chelvistero | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | January 15, 2010 19:43 |
| Mesh Independence - Valid Strategy? | Ianto | Main CFD Forum | 2 | August 31, 2009 04:36 |
Linear Mode
