|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
doumet
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
hi all...
i'm trying to solve this problem with CFX5, but till now i failed due to wrong configurations, hope you can help me with these one,and i w'll be so greatful. my problem explain how aerator works in sludge lagoon in waste water treatment plans, the aerator rotate at 43 rpm and i already made symmetry plans,but the main problem i had is what the boundary that i should add, the interfaces too, and why i can't run the problem with turbo mode? the purpose for this problem is to simulate how water get in and out throught the aerator. and to know the dead point. thanks. luai ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,901
Rep Power: 144 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Can you show an drawing or photograph of what you want to model?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
doumet
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
this may help!
surface aerator drawing: ![]() surface aerator work flow: ![]() picture for aerator (the blades here is different from my model, but with the same working idea) ![]() surface aerator (solidworks part): ![]() thanks ghorrocks, Luai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,901
Rep Power: 144 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thank you for the very clear description. I understand what you are trying to do now - few people bother putting clear descriptions in their posts.
First of all, a comment which will make a major difference to run time: Your geometry appears to have 15 or 20 blades. So rather than model a 90° segment with 5 or so blades, model 1/n of it, where n is the number of blades - that is a single blade passage. Use periodic interfaces on either sides. Providing the flow is the same in all passages this approach will save a lot of time and difficulty. A second comment which also simplifies things: You do not need a stationary and rotating part in the model I see you have above. Just put the thing in one big rotating domain. Then you do not need interfaces and that simplifies things. There are a few approaches you can take with this. Rather than the inlet flow rate you have specified, why not just put the device in liquid and let it generate its own flow? That is what the thing does in real life. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
New Member
doumet
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
Thanks a lot for your car ghorrocks,
I got the main idea that you provided, but I’m not sure if i can do it right without your help!!! This is the modified 3D aerator with one blade and two passages. I put some boundaries on it but not sure if its right!? Where i must put periodic interfaces, (in the both sides of the water domain!?) i make two domain, have the same fluid (water), and both are rotating at 47 rpm, but i fail to show the total blades in CFD-POST, because the main goal of the simulation is to show the water how get in and out by plotting a section that explain that. [There must be some dead point having zero velocity due to low rotating speed (47rpm).] The idea of "generate its own flow" is little bit confuse for me. Here is what I done lately: ![]() CFD 3D Viewer file: aerator |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,901
Rep Power: 144 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() Use periodic interfaces, not symmetry planes. Have a look at the turbo machinery tutorial examples for how to set this up. You correctly say you need something for the flow to react against otherwise it will just rotate at the impeller velocity - in this case you set the bottom and outer walls as counter rotating walls, which in a rotating frame of reference means they are stationary. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
New Member
doumet
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
New Member
doumet
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
ghorrocks, I made” Multiphase Flow in a Mixing Vessel” tutorial and it helps a lots. Thanks
For the setup solation: But the results did satisfy me enough, there is something wrong with boundary or interfaces maybe!? I made an impeller domain (rotate at 47 rpm) and lagoon domain (stationary), without inlet and outlet boundary; i take the buoyancy effect too. I configure Periodic surfaces to the lagoon and the impeller domains, and all interfaces in the impeller domain. Till now everything being good, at least I guess!! For the results: The water must get in from the bottom of the impeller and get out from the passages to lagoon, and that not happen!! The angular velocity is right i check it. The Torque is very small. I don’t know what’s wrong; I relay need some help with the setup configurations for the modal. Thanks. luai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,901
Rep Power: 144 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Many of the other tutorials will also be of assistance. Have a look at free surface flow over a bump and some of the rotating machinery tutorials.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ICEM] Proper way to name boundaries on 2D model for use in CFX? | RossFS | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 4 | November 10, 2011 03:38 |
Pros and Cons for CFX, CFdesign, COMSOL | Val | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 10, 2011 03:20 |
CFX pressure in Simulations problem | nasdak | CFX | 1 | April 14, 2010 14:22 |
PhD using CFX | Rui | CFX | 9 | May 28, 2007 06:59 |
CFX 4.4 installation problem | Pandu Sattvika | CFX | 1 | December 1, 2001 05:07 |