|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
hamed
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
hi every one.......i modeled a shock tube problem in cfx v12.1 but its results have many fluctuation.......should i give 0 [atm] for refrence pressure?
problem: air ideal gas.....high pressure:300kpa low pressure:150kpa high pressure length:0.5m low pressure length:1.5m total time:0.001 RMS Courant Number:0.01 max Courant Number:0.04 do this value for max Courant Number is Logical?? do you can explain it? thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,917
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
My PhD thesis has a discussion about things to consider when trying to get accurate shock wave modelling, see http://hdl.handle.net/2100/248 |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
hamed
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
thanks a lot for replay....
You should define the reference pressure as the base pressure in the model. Search the forum for further details, this question has been asked a lot. do u can explain it for me....i solved my problem with a 0 atm refrence pressure and my results were logical when i use 1atm refrence pressure it didnt give a normal solve......what should i use for my problem as i say above Do a time step sensitivity check to establish the best time step size? how do i do it? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,917
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Both of these questions have been asked many times on the forum. Do a search to find them.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
HLL Riemann Shock Tube Matlab Problem | Luke F | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 20, 2016 03:10 |
Shock tube simulation | harish | FLUENT | 5 | January 25, 2014 03:20 |
rhoCentralFoam not reflecting shock in Shock Tube? | Astaria | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | March 4, 2012 04:07 |
shock tube validation | AB | Main CFD Forum | 3 | December 10, 2004 08:31 |
shock tube validation | AB | Siemens | 0 | November 21, 2004 19:43 |