CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > CFX

Bubble size distribution : Bubble column

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 26, 2012, 11:07
Default Bubble size distribution : Bubble column
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kindom
Posts: 475
Rep Power: 13
oj.bulmer will become famous soon enough
Sponsored Links

I was wondering what would be the right way to specify the bubble diameter distribution in CFX for polydispersed phase in bubble column.

1) Polydispersed phase gas with 20 diameter groups
2) Eulerian Inhomogeneous (separate velocity field for liquid and gas), MUSIG homogeneous (One velocity field for all bubble groups)

I have observed that the bubble sizes peak at 6-7 mm and would want to specify fine distribution between 1 to 10 mm while coarse distribution between 10 to 40 mm.

I realise some sort of geometric progression is a right choice. But have no idea what should be exact geometric ratio.

Any help in this would be appreciated.

oj.bulmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Old   July 26, 2012, 19:34
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 13,722
Rep Power: 106
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
The MUSIG approaches are designed for this so are likely to be more computationally manageable. But if you have a chance I would try both approaches and see how they compare.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2012, 21:30
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kindom
Posts: 475
Rep Power: 13
oj.bulmer will become famous soon enough
Am not sure I understood your statement

I was talking about only one approach - homogeneous MUSIG in non-homogeneous Eulerian-Eulerian framework. So velocity field for gas and liquid are different. But velocity field for all gas bubble groups is same.

Ideally, the volume averaged size fractions plotted for different bubble diameter groups should be dome shaped and not top heavy, requiring that sufficient range of diameters should be covered to keep the peak somewhere in the middle. This range for my case is 1 to 40 mm as I have deduced.

Now, I need to make sure that I have enough no. of diameter groups in that range, such that any further increase in that number doesn't have significant effect on gas holdup or inter-facial area density. This is like discretization in bubble size group diameters to achieve size group independence.

A geometric progression should be a good fit here. Yet instead of going by a hunch in guessing the geometric ratio, I thought of running it by this forum to see if anyone has stumbled upon a more scientific method.

oj.bulmer is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 18 March 3, 2015 06:36
critical error during installation of openfoam Fabio88 OpenFOAM Installation 21 June 2, 2010 03:01
OF 1.6 | Ubuntu 9.10 (64bit) | GLIBCXX_3.4.11 not found piprus OpenFOAM Installation 22 February 25, 2010 14:43
Phase locked average in run time panara OpenFOAM 2 February 20, 2008 15:37
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 12:55

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:24.