|
[Sponsors] |
October 2, 2012, 17:15 |
Y+ upper bound
|
#1 |
Senior Member
---------
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 303
Rep Power: 17 |
In relation to the k - epsilon turbulence model I infer the following from the CFX documentation:
" Y+≥11.06 and the upper limit for y+ is a function of the device Reynolds number. For example, a large ship may have a Reynolds number of 10^9 and y+ can safely go to values much greater than 1000. For lower Reynolds numbers (for example, a small pump), the entire boundary layer might only extend to around y+ = 300. In this case, a fine near wall spacing is required to ensure a sufficient number of nodes in the boundary layer. " Could some one please explain how to check if a particular Y+ is apt for a flow with a particular Reynolds number (or) is there any way to calculate the required Y+ before starting the simulation if the Reynolds number is known
__________________
Best regards, Santhosh. |
|
October 2, 2012, 19:00 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143 |
Sensitivity study - the same answer for just about any adjustable parameter in CFD.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Specific_Heat_by_T_integral:invalid upper bound, T1<=0 | krishna_geca | FLUENT | 2 | March 24, 2019 10:39 |
Solution variables goes outside upper limit -how to localize fatal overflow occurance | Dimone | CFX | 2 | January 21, 2011 06:35 |
Create an upper bound | daniel_mills | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | October 20, 2006 18:34 |
Warning 097- | AB | Siemens | 6 | November 15, 2004 04:41 |
Temperature went outside of its upper limit | Atit Koonsrisuk | CFX | 0 | January 8, 2004 11:43 |