|
[Sponsors] |
Question about heat transfer simulation convergence |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,480
Rep Power: 140 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Member
Ben B. Huang
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
Thanks for your reply
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Member
VB
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Quote:
The global imblances are with in 1% . I checked the yplus value near the fluid and solid interface and it is 30+ for 70% of the area and 80+ for 30% of the area. I use SST model. What can be the reason for this residual graph shoot up after 350 iterations ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Senior Member
Mr CFD
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Britain
Posts: 361
Rep Power: 14 ![]() |
Without knowing what you're simulating it's hard to give a proper answer.
It could be due to a poor mesh, poor choice of model, both, or something else completely. To me it might look like the simulation is resolving some evolving flow physics (maybe vorticies which grow as a function of time?). Start a new thread and give a detailed description of what you're doing. Also I'm sure Ghorrocks will be around to tell you to read the FAQ - so do that too. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,480
Rep Power: 140 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sadly, I don't think an FAQ covers this one
![]() I agree with Mr CFD's comments: First check for numerical problems (mesh, models), and if they look OK check for transient flow starting up, such as vortex shedding or gross flow instabilities. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
Member
VB
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Member
VB
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
okay,Ghorrocks. I ll try to create new thread with more details on this regard.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
Hello! Thank you all for this useful thread, it helps a lot in CHT related topics.
I am trying to simulate a multistage axial turbine throw CFX to account later for the temperature field on turbine blades by thermal analysis. To succeed more acqurate results i implemented in my model Conjugate Heat Transfer with a loose couple (different mesh between fluid region (TurboGrid) and solid region (Ansys Meshing) through CFX. When i applied CFX to only the second rotor stage (to check if it works fine with my settings (interfaces etc.)) it results with good convergence both from residuals side and global imbalance as well. However, when i tried to add mesh for another stage then RMS-T Energy for the previous stage is diverging like in the attached image. Timescale for fluid domain is set as 1/omega through an expression (as suggested by CFX-manual) I used different Timescales for the solid domains like 1000, 100, 10 and 1s but it tends to give similar results in all cases. I would be grateful if you could make me aware of what is the possible cause of that. Again, Thank you! Residuals' Plots: https://ibb.co/Btk2PMn https://ibb.co/zh2sPQy https://ibb.co/PjrqPpY |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transient heat transfer simulation with variable heat source | rdr | CFX | 3 | July 31, 2015 04:33 |
Question about fluid-solid conduction heat transfer contact resistance | Anna Tian | Main CFD Forum | 1 | May 7, 2013 10:39 |
Heat Transfer mechanisms | tafaugl | CFX | 1 | November 7, 2012 18:46 |
increasing mesh quality is leading to poor convergence | tippo | CFX | 2 | May 5, 2009 10:55 |
Heat transfer convergence problem | kam | FLUENT | 0 | February 26, 2007 12:32 |