# Radial inflow through rotating cavity

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 June 12, 2013, 11:00 Radial inflow through rotating cavity #1 New Member   Join Date: May 2013 Posts: 4 Rep Power: 6 Hi! This is my first post here, I hope someone can give me help in my problem: I am modelling a rotating cavity in CFX, similar to this, with a superimposed radial inflow. My geometry differs in the following manner; The left-hand disk extends all the way down to a central shaft. The inlet is the same as in the schematic. Air enters the central slot at the periphery of the cavity, flows inward radially turns right and is expelled through a annular hole in the center of the right-hand disk (outer radius 36 mm, inner radius 12 mm). This flow is imposed using blowers. I am having issues posing reasonable boundaries and would like some guidance. What I know: 1. Total Pressure at inlet 2. Swirl at inlet is 1 (inlet flow tangential velocity is the same as periphery of disks) 3. The mass flow through the cavity is around 9 g/s 4. Angular velocity of disks 5. Geometry of disks The main issue I'm having is posing a good outlet boundary, as the flow is highly tangential and I get backflow very easily. What I am using so far is an L-shaped domain in the rotating reference frame. A Total Pressure inlet with the direction set to normal to boundary. At the outlet (extended roughly 7 times the distance of last obstacle) I have a "Radial Equilibrium" average static pressure outlet. The problem with this is that I have to vary the pressure until I get the desired mass flow, as the pressure here is unknown to me. Needless to say, this is painful Is my outlet boundary even reasonable (I am not sure I understand the radial equilibrium outlet correctly)? Any guidance or comments would be very much appreciated!

 June 12, 2013, 18:48 #2 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 13,993 Rep Power: 107 If you know the mass flow then use a mass flow boundary condition. No point using a pressure boundary when you do not know the pressure.

 June 13, 2013, 03:21 #3 New Member   Join Date: May 2013 Posts: 4 Rep Power: 6 Thank you for your reply! Could I then please ask you which mass flow boundary you think would be the most suited for my case? I have tried using a mass flow outlet, and this gives the correct mass flow (of course). But is there a mass flow boundary that would give me the correct pressure distribution at outlet too? I am fairly new to CFX and have therefore not yet had time to learn what all the options do, as I'm under some time pressure (this is school work). From what I understood of the manual, the "shift pressure" option would do this, but this option leads the solver to build walls, thus disqualifying the solution. I have tried the constant flux boundary, as my outlet flow is highly tangential, but I fear this is unphysical.

 June 13, 2013, 06:34 #4 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 13,993 Rep Power: 107 If there is only one inlet and one outlet you cannot specify mass flow at the inlet and outlet. This is over specifying the simulation. In this case, if you specify the mass flow at the outlet then you have to have the same mass flow at the inlet to conserve mass - so you define the pressure at the inlet intead. You comment the flow is highly tangential at the outlet - this is not a good idea. I would consider extending your outlet to a location where the flow is simpler and the flow can cross the outlet approximately at right angles to the boundary.

 June 13, 2013, 08:45 #5 New Member   Join Date: May 2013 Posts: 4 Rep Power: 6 Thank you for the reply Glenn! I understand that mass both in and out is a bad idea and have not done that, I appologise for the bad description. What I meant was that I have tried using a mass flow outlet and a total pressure inlet, as you write. What I would like to do is impose a radial pressure profile at the outlet as well as mass. Because of this highly swirling flow, I know that the pressure will vary with radius. So I would like to specify the mass flow rate out, and enforce a pressure distribution radially. But I am unsure if this is possible? As I stated before, I have tried using the following outlet BC: Mass flow rate Massflow Update > Shift Pressure This, seemingly, allwos me to impose a pressure profile using a CEL expression? Am I correct in this assumption? I have read the manual but I'm unsure that I understand it correctly, why I wanted to ask on the forum Regarding the outlet BC having swirling flow I agree, ideally I would like to place it further away from the bend. But I am trying to model an experiment and am thus trying to keep to the real geometry as much as possible.

 June 13, 2013, 10:31 #6 New Member   Join Date: May 2013 Posts: 4 Rep Power: 6 I should also add for clarity, the annular outlet pipe also rotates with the same angular velocity as the cavity (it is an extension of the disks). Thus, the swirl doesn't dissipate with axial position.

June 13, 2013, 18:49
#7
Super Moderator

Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 13,993
Rep Power: 107
Quote:
 But I am trying to model an experiment and am thus trying to keep to the real geometry as much as possible.
I think you missed the point - the experiment did something with the outlet fluid, it probably entered a pipe and flowed away. A boundary on that outlet pipe would be much better than one in the complex region of flow.

As for the boundaries - You cannot specify pressure and flow rate at a boundary. Rather you should specify flow rate at the other boundary and pressure at this one.

 June 14, 2013, 14:09 #8 Member   Benny Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 40 Rep Power: 7 Hi, I will expect that you will get "backflow" caused by the swirl close to the outlet. If the flow will exit the rotating domain in reaility you have the option to use the opening boundary condicton or to model the geometrie after the rotating domain. This is the "first basic step" to be able to get a reasonable simulation! Second step is to play with boundaries! If you use incompressible fluid it does not matter waht will be the absolute pressure value at the inlet or outlet. It is only important that the pressure difference is correct because this drives the flow. so you could use the mass flow boundary condicton, finish the calculcation and shift the pressuere field to the value you want in cfd-post. Or you need to set the correct pressure difference and get the mass flow. Hope these ideas help.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post kelinjose CFX 2 February 28, 2013 14:00 Chetan Mistry CFX 5 June 2, 2007 13:13 Nanda FLUENT 1 July 17, 2006 14:52 Ammu FLUENT 1 July 23, 2005 13:36 liaolingling FLUENT 0 April 27, 2005 04:24

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:25.