
[Sponsors] 
July 8, 2013, 06:55 
[Pictures] Pressure distribution problem

#1 
Member
Sebastian
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 6 
Hello,
maybe some of you will know (probably Glenn ) but I am trying to simulate acoustic induced cavitation with a sonotrode. I attached the pictures of the setup and my problem. Problems:  I have a really strange pressure distribution within the domain. Somehow the pressure isnt working well. Once I have a pretty low pressure somewhiere in the domain (below saturation pressure, due to the movement of the top cylinder) it stays pretty low and doesnt go up anymore.  Convergence problem: The RMS are fine but the Max Res are sometimes way above the target and the linear solution is always critical. I would be glad if you have any hints how to fix this. Attachements: 1. Setup 2. Timestep 0 3. Timestep 5 4. Timestep 60 5. CCL File 

July 8, 2013, 08:07 

#2 
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 13,449
Rep Power: 104 
I have never heard of a sonotrode before. I have learnt something today .
Have a look in CFDPost where the maximum residuals are located but I bet they are in the narrow gap, which I presume is the oscillating bit. You have defined the time step size. Have you any justification for this time step size or is it just a guess? For an extremely complex simulation like this I would use adaptive time stepping, with 510 coeff loops per iteration and define max and min time step sizes wide enough that the solver will never reach them. I suspect this model will need very small time steps to run successfully. 

July 8, 2013, 08:15 

#3 
Member
Sebastian
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 6 
Thanks for the quick and helpful reply. I did a sensitivity test on the model with straight movement. It worked best with 20 Timesteps from 0 to 2pi. I didnt work with adaptive time step yet but it sounds correct what you suggest. I try it with a mesh of only 1e6 nodes and see if it runs.


July 8, 2013, 08:37 

#4 
Member
Sebastian
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 6 
Sorry for the doublepost but I have a general question.
At the moment I used to run incompressible solutions. I tryed to have a fully closed system (the opening in top was a free slip wall aswell). I thought that the strange pressure distribution was due to the closed system and incompressibility. Since the Volume grows due to cavitation (vapour) and no compressibility is alowed I get extremly strange pressure (either extremly high or extremly low). Does it makes sense to you and should I try it with the opening or rather the closed system (like i would like to do it) edit: I am now trying to do it compressible too with the following functions: 1. Water Vapour density: p, li { whitespace: prewrap; } 0.0006 [kg m^3]+(7e6*Absolute Pressure)/1 [Pa] * 1[kg m^3] 2. Water density: 998.161 [kg m^3] + (5e7 *Absolute Pressure)/1 [Pa] *1 [kg m^3] edit: I posted a pretty strange initial pressure distribution from the very first timestep (0) Last edited by Badi; July 8, 2013 at 13:32. 

July 13, 2013, 07:09 

#5 
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 13,449
Rep Power: 104 
You always need to have some way of the simulation to handle small variations in mass/volume. An incompressibel simulation in an enclosed volume will never converge. Adding compressibility can fix that, so can adding a pressure outlet. You choose what is more appropriate.
You diagram is meaningless. You have magnified tiny pressure variations which are so small they are under 1Pa. It is hard to say whether this is meaningful or not, but I suspect not. 

July 13, 2013, 07:17 

#6 
Member
Sebastian
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 6 
Hello,
you are right, the way I was doing it was basically just trying to get more accurate data from invalid physics. I changed the setup now so it should work better now since the cavitation is mostly due to acoustics. The system is closed now (it has a free slip topwall), I changed the viscosity to a minimal value (so I have really laminar flow) and a densitypressure function for vapour and water. What bothers me is that the solver starts with the right value for speed of sound of water (~1400 m/s I have a linear function for that) but with a wrong value for vapour (1e30, where my function is giving me ~300 m/s). Is this maybe because of the default starting volume fraction of 1e15 of water vapour? 

July 13, 2013, 07:48 

#7 
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 13,449
Rep Power: 104 
Umm  low viscosity = high Re = turbulent flow. If you want low Re and laminar flow you need to INCREASE the viscosity.
I would only look at the acoustic velocity of regions where the volume fraction is high enough that something is happening  maybe 0.1. The acoustic velocity of regions with volume fraction of just about zero is going to be silly numbers. 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
"Pressure Inlet" Boundary Setup  Wijaya  FLUENT  15  May 18, 2016 10:08 
Pressure Outlet Guage pressure  Mohsin  FLUENT  36  April 29, 2016 17:16 
CFX pressure in Simulations problem  nasdak  CFX  1  April 14, 2010 13:22 
Pressure outlet problem  IronMike  FLUENT  1  February 2, 2010 02:47 
Hydrostatic pressure in 2phase flow modeling (long)  DS & HB  Main CFD Forum  0  January 8, 2000 16:00 